Field vs Colebatch
Field is the younger of the two, with a median age of 43 against 56 in Colebatch. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Colebatch, the large majority of households are people living alone. On these figures, Field tends to suit families with children, while Colebatch suits young adults and people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Field
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (10 vs 1)
- is already more of a family suburb (60% vs 20%)
- carries lower crime risk (19/100 vs 43/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
Renters
Colebatch
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (5% vs 18%)
- has cheaper rent ($75/wk vs $250/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Field
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (130 min vs 159 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (184.7 km vs 211.4 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Field carries lower crime risk (19/100 vs 43/100)
- Colebatch has more residents already 65 and over (27% vs 19%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Field
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (5.1% vs -21.1%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Field and Colebatch drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Field rents higher ($250/wk vs $75/wk); Field has more residents (83 vs 56).
| Field | Colebatch | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 83 +33% vs other | 56 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +5.1% | -21.1% |
| Median age | 43 | 56 |
| Median household income | $73,112/yr | $84,448/yr +16% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $250/wk +70% vs other | $75/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.3%).
Zoning mix
| Field | Colebatch | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 91% | 98% |
| Environmental | 9% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Field | Colebatch | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 28 across Coorong same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -50% same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Field | Colebatch | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 47% of SA | Higher than 59% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 38% of SA | Higher than 5% of SA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 65% of SA | — |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 48% of SA | Higher than 27% of SA |
Liveability
| Field | Colebatch | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Colebatch carries more crime risk (43 vs 19); Colebatch carries more bushfire risk (49 vs 37).
| Field | Colebatch | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 37/100 | Moderate 49/100 |
| Crime | Low 19/100 | Moderate 43/100 |
| Flood | — same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Field | Colebatch | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Field | Colebatch | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 10 | 1 |
Mobility
Colebatch sits further from the CBD (211.4 km vs 184.7 km).
| Field | Colebatch | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Adelaide | 184.7 km | 211.4 km +14% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 130 min | 159 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.7% postcode 5265 | 0.0% postcode 5266 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 46 postcode 5265 | 63 postcode 5266 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (65.4%).
Setting
| Field | Colebatch | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 16 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 13 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 25.4 km | 22.4 km |
NBN connectivity
| Field | Colebatch | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 29/100 | 17/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Satellite (Sky Muster) |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 36 premises | 0% 23 premises |
Climate
| Field | Colebatch | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 460 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 26.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.0°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Field | Colebatch | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,465/yr same for both | |
| Council | Coorong same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Field | Colebatch | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Barker same for both | |
| Member | Tony Pasin same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Field | Colebatch | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Field
Other comparisons with Colebatch
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.