Ferodale vs Eagleton
Ferodale is the younger of the two, with a median age of 43 against 50 in Eagleton. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Ferodale, most households are couple families. In Eagleton, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Ferodale tends to suit couples, while Eagleton suits people living alone and older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Ferodale is already more of a family suburb (76% vs 59%)
- Eagleton carries lower crime risk (32/100 vs 96/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Ferodale
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (17% vs 26%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Eagleton
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($310/wk vs $400/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Eagleton
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (133 min vs 142 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (178.9 km vs 188.7 km)
- But Ferodale is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Eagleton
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (32/100 vs 96/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (28% vs 18%)
- But Ferodale is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Ferodale
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (18.1% vs -2.8%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Ferodale and Eagleton drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Eagleton has more residents (205 vs 98); Ferodale rents higher ($400/wk vs $310/wk).
| Ferodale | Eagleton | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 98 | 205 +109% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +18.1% | -2.8% |
| Median age | 43 | 50 |
| Median household income | $81,224/yr +9% vs other | $73,892/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $400/wk +22% vs other | $310/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.4%).
Property market
| Ferodale | Eagleton | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $900,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
Eagleton has more rural and farming land (84% vs 19%); Ferodale has more land zoned for conservation (22% vs 9%).
| Ferodale | Eagleton | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 19% | 84% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 59% | 1% |
| Environmental | 22% | 9% |
| Residential | 0% | 6% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Ferodale | Eagleton | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 495 across Port Stephens same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -72% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Ferodale | Eagleton | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — | Higher than 88% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 49% of NSW | Higher than 41% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 59% of NSW | Higher than 30% of NSW |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 5% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 59% of NSW | Higher than 51% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 31% of NSW | Higher than 34% of NSW |
Liveability
Ferodale is more walkable (10 vs 0).
| Ferodale | Eagleton | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
Ferodale carries more bushfire risk (78 vs 0); Ferodale carries more crime risk (96 vs 32).
| Ferodale | Eagleton | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 78/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | High 96/100 | Low 32/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | High 83/100 | None 0/100 |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 2 within 5 km |
Schools
| Ferodale | Eagleton | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Ferodale | Eagleton | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 11 | 4 |
Mobility
Ferodale sits further from the CBD (188.7 km vs 178.9 km).
| Ferodale | Eagleton | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 10/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 188.7 km +5% vs other | 178.9 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 142 min | 133 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 2318 | 0.5% postcode 2324 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 79 postcode 2318 | 54 postcode 2324 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (60.0%).
Setting
| Ferodale | Eagleton | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 21 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 14 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 9.4 km | 14.5 km |
NBN connectivity
| Ferodale | Eagleton | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 21/100 | 24/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 24 premises | 0% 76 premises |
Climate
| Ferodale | Eagleton | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,181 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.7°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Ferodale | Eagleton | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.72 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Ferodale | Eagleton | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,359/yr same for both | |
| Council | Port Stephens same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Ferodale | Eagleton | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Paterson same for both | |
| Member | Meryl Swanson same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Ferodale | Eagleton | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Ferodale
Other comparisons with Eagleton
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.