Fawcetts Plain vs New Park
Fawcetts Plain is the younger of the two, with a median age of 42 against 52 in New Park. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Fawcetts Plain, most households are couple families. In New Park, most households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Fawcetts Plain: a median of $1.69 million, against $935,000 in New Park, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Fawcetts Plain tends to suit families with children and couples, while New Park suits people living alone, older residents, and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Fawcetts Plain is already more of a family suburb (86% vs 43%)
- New Park has more parks and reserves (3 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Fawcetts Plain leaves households under less mortgage stress (19% vs 25%)
- New Park has cheaper houses ($935,000 vs $1,690,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
New Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($255/wk vs $350/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
New Park
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (504 min vs 509 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (744.7 km vs 750.6 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
New Park
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (13/100 vs 31/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (28% vs 15%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Fawcetts Plain and New Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Fawcetts Plain has higher household incomes ($89,336 vs $53,040); Fawcetts Plain rents higher ($350/wk vs $255/wk).
| Fawcetts Plain | New Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 155 +8% vs other | 142 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +0.6% | -3.4% |
| Median age | 42 | 52 |
| Median household income | $89,336/yr +41% vs other | $53,040/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $350/wk +27% vs other | $255/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.5%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Fawcetts Plain | New Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,690,000 | $935,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
Fawcetts Plain has more rural and farming land (98% vs 85%).
| Fawcetts Plain | New Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 98% | 85% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 10% |
| Residential | 0% | 4% |
| Environmental | 1% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Fawcetts Plain | New Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 25 across Kyogle same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +0% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Fawcetts Plain | New Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 80% of NSW | Higher than 46% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 57% of NSW | Higher than 13% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 57% of NSW | Higher than 65% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 19% of NSW | Higher than 23% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 11% of NSW | Higher than 12% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 58% of NSW | Higher than 62% of NSW |
Liveability
| Fawcetts Plain | New Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | high-need area decile 1/10 |
Risk profile
Fawcetts Plain carries more bushfire risk (32 vs 0); Fawcetts Plain carries more crime risk (31 vs 13).
| Fawcetts Plain | New Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 32/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Low 31/100 | Low 13/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Fawcetts Plain | New Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Fawcetts Plain | New Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 3 |
| Waterways | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
Fawcetts Plain sits further from the CBD (750.6 km vs 744.7 km).
| Fawcetts Plain | New Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 10/100 | 15/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 750.6 km | 744.7 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 509 min | 504 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.1% postcode 2474 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 71 postcode 2474 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.9%).
Setting
| Fawcetts Plain | New Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 63 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 57 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Fawcetts Plain | New Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 57 premises same for both | |
Climate
| Fawcetts Plain | New Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,569 mm | 1,016 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.1°C | — |
| Winter min (Jul) | 9.1°C | — |
Council rates
| Fawcetts Plain | New Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,264/yr same for both | |
| Council | Kyogle same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Fawcetts Plain | New Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Page same for both | |
| Member | Kevin Hogan same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Fawcetts Plain | New Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Fawcetts Plain
Other comparisons with New Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.