Fassifern Valley vs Kalbar
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Fassifern Valley, most households are couple families. In Kalbar, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Fassifern Valley tends to suit families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Fassifern Valley
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (13/100 vs 35/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Kalbar
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($300/wk vs $350/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Kalbar
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (13/100 vs 0/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (84.6 km vs 89.6 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Fassifern Valley carries lower crime risk (13/100 vs 35/100)
- Kalbar is more walkable (13/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Fassifern Valley
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (23.1% vs 14.0%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Fassifern Valley and Kalbar drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Kalbar has more residents (1,246 vs 112); Fassifern Valley has higher household incomes ($81,224 vs $66,300).
| Fassifern Valley | Kalbar | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112 | 1,246 +1012% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +23.1% | +14.0% |
| Median age | 43 | 41 |
| Median household income | $81,224/yr +18% vs other | $66,300/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $350/wk +14% vs other | $300/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.0%).
Property market
| Fassifern Valley | Kalbar | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $800,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $700,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 20 days from 13 sales |
Development activity
| Fassifern Valley | Kalbar | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 524 across Scenic Rim same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +65% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Fassifern Valley | Kalbar | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 52% of QLD | Higher than 32% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 51% of QLD | Higher than 74% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 61% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 62% of QLD | Higher than 53% of QLD |
Liveability
Kalbar is more walkable (13 vs 0).
| Fassifern Valley | Kalbar | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | B |
| Score | — | 53/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
Fassifern Valley carries more bushfire risk (22 vs 0); Kalbar carries more crime risk (35 vs 13).
| Fassifern Valley | Kalbar | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 22/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Low 13/100 | Low 35/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Fassifern Valley | Kalbar | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Fassifern Valley
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Kalbar
- Kalbar State School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Fassifern Valley | Kalbar | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 2 |
| Childcare | 0 | 2 |
| GPs | 0 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 2 |
| Waterways | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
Fassifern Valley sits further from the CBD (89.6 km vs 84.6 km).
| Fassifern Valley | Kalbar | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 13/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 89.6 km +6% vs other | 84.6 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 71 min | 68 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 4309 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 78 postcode 4309 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.0%).
Setting
| Fassifern Valley | Kalbar | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 109 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 83 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Fassifern Valley | Kalbar | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 38 premises | 0% 576 premises |
Climate
| Fassifern Valley | Kalbar | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 897 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 31.3°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.1°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Fassifern Valley | Kalbar | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.27 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Fassifern Valley | Kalbar | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,689/yr same for both | |
| Council | Scenic Rim same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Fassifern Valley | Kalbar | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Wright same for both | |
| Member | Scott Buchholz same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Fassifern Valley | Kalbar | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Fassifern Valley
Other comparisons with Kalbar
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.