Farrar vs Gunn
In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Farrar, most households are couple families. In Gunn, about half of households are couple families.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Gunn
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (6 vs 3)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (98% vs 79%)
Weighs schools, house stock, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Gunn
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (78/100 vs 54/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Farrar
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (21% vs 2%)
- has more GPs (2 vs 0)
- But Gunn is more walkable (78/100 vs 54/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.
Investors
Farrar
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (8.7% vs -3.8%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Farrar and Gunn drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Gunn has more residents (2,564 vs 1,650).
| Farrar | Gunn | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,650 | 2,564 +55% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +8.7% | -3.8% |
| Median age | 32 | 31 |
| Median household income | $133,796/yr +3% vs other | $129,220/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $455/wk | $480/wk +5% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.4%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Farrar | Gunn | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $720,000 | $672,500 |
| Median unit price | $465,000 | — |
| Median land price | $217,500 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 25 days from 5 sales | 13 days from 21 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
10 vs 66 sales
24 vs 42 sales
Development activity
| Farrar | Gunn | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 247 across Palmerston same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -3% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Farrar | Gunn | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 5.0% $775/wk on $800K | 4.9% $750/wk on $790K |
| Units | 5.4% $625/wk on $600K | — |
Ranking within NT
| Farrar | Gunn | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 90% of NT | Higher than 88% of NT |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 86% of NT | Higher than 97% of NT |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 63% of NT | Higher than 71% of NT |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 99% of NT | Higher than 94% of NT |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 40% of NT | Higher than 33% of NT |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 4% of NT | — |
Liveability
Gunn is more walkable (78 vs 54); Gunn scores higher overall (76 vs 66).
| Farrar | Gunn | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | A |
| Score | 66/100 | 76/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
| Farrar | Gunn | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Crime | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Farrar | Gunn | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Farrar | Gunn | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 6 |
| Childcare | 3 | 1 |
| GPs | 2 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
| Farrar | Gunn | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 54/100 | 78/100 |
| Distance to Darwin | 22.5 km +1% vs other | 22.2 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 22 min | 23 min |
| Public transport score | 57/100 Bus | 32/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 18.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 5.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 11 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 0830 | 0.4% postcode 0832 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 39 postcode 0830 | 51 postcode 0832 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (86.3%).
Setting
| Farrar | Gunn | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 28 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 24 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 6.4 km | 5.4 km |
NBN connectivity
| Farrar | Gunn | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 100/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 100% 618 premises | 100% 986 premises |
Climate
| Farrar | Gunn | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,836 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 32.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 19.8°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Farrar | Gunn | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,608/yr same for both | |
| Council | Palmerston same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Farrar | Gunn | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Solomon same for both | |
| Member | Luke John Gosling same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Farrar | Gunn | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $50,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Farrar
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Farrar
Other comparisons with Gunn
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.