Fairy Hill vs Cedar Point
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Fairy Hill, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Fairy Hill tends to suit couples and older residents, while Cedar Point suits people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Fairy Hill
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (17/100 vs 31/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (73% vs 50%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Cedar Point
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (20% vs 5%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Fairy Hill
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (724.6 km vs 735.2 km)
- has a shorter drive in (487 min vs 494 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Fairy Hill
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (17/100 vs 31/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (31% vs 21%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Fairy Hill and Cedar Point drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Fairy Hill has more residents (407 vs 175).
| Fairy Hill | Cedar Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 407 +57% vs other | 175 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +5.7% | +2.9% |
| Median age | 49 | 50 |
| Median household income | $70,096/yr | $73,320/yr +5% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $300/wk | $320/wk +7% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (2.3%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Fairy Hill | Cedar Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $720,000 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
| Fairy Hill | Cedar Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 92% | 99% |
| Residential | 6% | 0% |
| Environmental | 2% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Fairy Hill | Cedar Point | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 24 across Richmond Valley | 25 across Kyogle |
| Approvals change year on year | -78% | +0% |
Ranking within NSW
| Fairy Hill | Cedar Point | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 27% of NSW | — |
| Income | Higher than 34% of NSW | Higher than 40% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 64% of NSW | Higher than 56% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 62% of NSW | — |
| EV adoption | Higher than 16% of NSW | Higher than 11% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 59% of NSW | Higher than 52% of NSW |
Liveability
| Fairy Hill | Cedar Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
Cedar Point carries more crime risk (31 vs 17).
| Fairy Hill | Cedar Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 17/100 | Low 31/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Fairy Hill | Cedar Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Fairy Hill | Cedar Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 2 | 3 |
Mobility
Cedar Point sits further from the CBD (735.2 km vs 724.6 km).
| Fairy Hill | Cedar Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 14/100 | 10/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 724.6 km | 735.2 km +1% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 487 min | 494 min |
| Public transport score | 21/100 Bus | 20/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 3.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 2.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 3 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.2% postcode 2470 | 0.1% postcode 2474 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 67 postcode 2470 | 71 postcode 2474 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.8%).
Setting
| Fairy Hill | Cedar Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 39 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 48 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Fairy Hill | Cedar Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 167 premises | 0% 82 premises |
Council rates
| Fairy Hill | Cedar Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,282/yr | $1,264/yr |
| Council | Richmond Valley | Kyogle |
Federal electorate
| Fairy Hill | Cedar Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Page same for both | |
| Member | Kevin Hogan same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Fairy Hill | Cedar Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Fairy Hill
Other comparisons with Cedar Point
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.