Fairy Bower vs Port Curtis
Port Curtis is the younger of the two, with a median age of 41 against 58 in Fairy Bower. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Fairy Bower, about half of households are couple families. In Port Curtis, about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Fairy Bower tends to suit couples and older residents, while Port Curtis suits people living alone and families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Too close to call
Nothing among the 6 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Port Curtis
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (21% vs 30%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Fairy Bower
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($225/wk vs $250/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Fairy Bower
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (436 min vs 457 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (632 km vs 636.3 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Fairy Bower
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more residents already 65 and over (34% vs 15%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Port Curtis
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (10.0% vs 2.1%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Fairy Bower and Port Curtis drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Port Curtis has more residents (309 vs 99); Fairy Bower skews older (58 vs 41).
| Fairy Bower | Port Curtis | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 99 | 309 +212% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +2.1% | +10.0% |
| Median age | 58 | 41 |
| Median household income | $55,224/yr | $60,112/yr +9% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $225/wk | $250/wk +11% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.2%).
Property market
| Fairy Bower | Port Curtis | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $422,500 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Development activity
| Fairy Bower | Port Curtis | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 390 across Rockhampton same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +133% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Fairy Bower | Port Curtis | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 17% of QLD | Higher than 25% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 69% of QLD | Higher than 41% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 78% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 55% of QLD | Higher than 70% of QLD |
Liveability
| Fairy Bower | Port Curtis | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 | high-need area decile 1/10 |
Risk profile
| Fairy Bower | Port Curtis | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 93/100 | High 87/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | High 91/100 | None 0/100 |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 3 within 5 km | 5 within 5 km |
Schools
| Fairy Bower | Port Curtis | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Fairy Bower
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Port Curtis
- Port Curtis Road State School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Fairy Bower | Port Curtis | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 same for both | |
| Waterways | 6 | 8 |
Mobility
Port Curtis sits further from the CBD (636.3 km vs 632 km).
| Fairy Bower | Port Curtis | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 6/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 632 km | 636.3 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 436 min | 457 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.8% postcode 4700 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 43 postcode 4700 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.2%).
Setting
| Fairy Bower | Port Curtis | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 8 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 5 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 17.0 km | 9.3 km |
NBN connectivity
| Fairy Bower | Port Curtis | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 53/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Fibre to the node |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 43 premises | 26% 150 premises |
Climate
| Fairy Bower | Port Curtis | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 811 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 32.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 11.6°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Fairy Bower | Port Curtis | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 4.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 8.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Fairy Bower | Port Curtis | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,313/yr same for both | |
| Council | Rockhampton same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Fairy Bower | Port Curtis | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Capricornia same for both | |
| Member | Michelle Landry same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Fairy Bower | Port Curtis | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Fairy Bower
Other comparisons with Port Curtis
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.