Fairview Park vs Yatala Vale
Fairview Park is the younger of the two, with a median age of 40 against 49 in Yatala Vale. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Fairview Park, about half of households are couple families. In Yatala Vale, the large majority of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Fairview Park: a median of $878,000, against $590,000 in Yatala Vale. On these figures, Yatala Vale tends to suit couples and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Fairview Park has more parks and reserves (10 vs 0)
- Yatala Vale carries lower crime risk (14/100 vs 32/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Yatala Vale
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($590,000 vs $878,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Fairview Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (57/100 vs 25/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Yatala Vale
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (14/100 vs 32/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (28% vs 20%)
- But Fairview Park is more walkable (57/100 vs 25/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Fairview Park and Yatala Vale drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Fairview Park has more residents (3,792 vs 260); Yatala Vale has higher household incomes ($131,612 vs $99,476).
| Fairview Park | Yatala Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,792 +93% vs other | 260 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +5.4% | +3.6% |
| Median age | 40 | 49 |
| Median household income | $99,476/yr | $131,612/yr +32% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $370/wk same for both | |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (10.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Fairview Park | Yatala Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $878,000 | $590,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 18 days from 35 sales | — |
Zoning mix
Yatala Vale has more land zoned for conservation (70% vs 13%); Yatala Vale has more rural and farming land (30% vs 7%).
| Fairview Park | Yatala Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 13% | 70% |
| Residential | 64% | 0% |
| Rural and farming | 7% | 30% |
| Parks and recreation | 15% | 0% |
| Commercial | 2% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Fairview Park | Yatala Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 574 across Tea Tree Gully same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +36% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Fairview Park | Yatala Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.9% $600/wk on $800K | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Fairview Park | Yatala Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 31% of SA | Higher than 2% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 78% of SA | Higher than 95% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 83% of SA | Higher than 74% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 89% of SA | Higher than 99% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 58% of SA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 86% of SA | Higher than 80% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 48% of SA | — |
Liveability
Fairview Park is more walkable (57 vs 25).
| Fairview Park | Yatala Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | — |
| Score | 41/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
Fairview Park carries more crime risk (32 vs 14); Yatala Vale carries more flood risk (90 vs 77).
| Fairview Park | Yatala Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 55/100 | Moderate 60/100 |
| Crime | Low 32/100 | Low 14/100 |
| Flood | High 77/100 | High 90/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 5 within 5 km | 4 within 5 km |
Schools
| Fairview Park | Yatala Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Fairview Park
- Fairview Park Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Yatala Vale
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Fairview Park | Yatala Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 3 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 10 | 0 |
| Childcare | 5 | 0 |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
| Fairview Park | Yatala Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 57/100 | 25/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 21.6 km | 23 km +6% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 34 min | 35 min |
| Public transport score | 78/100 Bus | 34/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 74.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 6.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 5126 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 63 postcode 5126 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (84.1%).
Setting
| Fairview Park | Yatala Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 221 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 265 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 15.7 km | 16.7 km |
NBN connectivity
| Fairview Park | Yatala Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 75/100 | 66/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 1,537 premises | 6% 90 premises |
Climate
| Fairview Park | Yatala Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 404 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.4°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Fairview Park | Yatala Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 18.7 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.31 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Fairview Park | Yatala Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,000/yr same for both | |
| Council | Tea Tree Gully same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Fairview Park | Yatala Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Makin same for both | |
| Member | Tony Zappia same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Fairview Park | Yatala Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Fairview Park
Yatala Vale
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Fairview Park
Other comparisons with Yatala Vale
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.