Erskine Park vs Minchinbury
Comparing Erskine Park and Minchinbury, NSW: Erskine Park carries more bushfire risk (82 vs 0); Minchinbury is more walkable (73 vs 50); and Erskine Park sits further from the CBD (44.2 km vs 40.5 km).
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Erskine Park carries lower crime risk (46/100 vs 79/100)
- Minchinbury has more childcare (9 vs 6)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Minchinbury
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper units ($760,000 vs $885,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Minchinbury
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (73/100 vs 50/100)
- has a shorter drive in (39 min vs 47 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (40.5 km vs 44.2 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Erskine Park carries lower crime risk (46/100 vs 79/100)
- Minchinbury is more walkable (73/100 vs 50/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Erskine Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (3.9% vs 3.0%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Erskine Park and Minchinbury drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Erskine Park skews older (37 vs 35).
| Erskine Park | Minchinbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,486 +11% vs other | 5,778 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +0.8% | +2.8% |
| Median age | 37 | 35 |
| Median household income | $122,148/yr +6% vs other | $114,816/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $450/wk same for both | |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.4%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Erskine Park | Minchinbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,210,000 | $1,235,000 |
| Median unit price | $885,000 | $760,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 26 days from 28 sales | 23 days from 37 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
31 vs 21 sales
37 vs 34 sales
7 vs 15 sales
Zoning mix
Erskine Park has more land zoned for conservation (17% vs 3%); Erskine Park has more industrially zoned land (48% vs 36%).
| Erskine Park | Minchinbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Industrial | 48% | 36% |
| Residential | 23% | 35% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 4% | 18% |
| Environmental | 17% | 3% |
| Parks and recreation | 7% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Erskine Park | Minchinbury | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,063 across Penrith | 2,325 across Blacktown |
| Approvals change year on year | -78% | -18% |
Gross rental yield
| Erskine Park | Minchinbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.9% $850/wk on $1.14M | 3.0% $685/wk on $1.2M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Erskine Park | Minchinbury | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 61% of NSW same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 85% of NSW | Higher than 79% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 81% of NSW | Higher than 89% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 67% of NSW | Higher than 62% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 50% of NSW | Higher than 32% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 84% of NSW | Higher than 94% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 67% of NSW | Higher than 20% of NSW |
Liveability
Minchinbury is more walkable (73 vs 50); Minchinbury scores higher overall (58 vs 41).
| Erskine Park | Minchinbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | B |
| Score | 41/100 | 58/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
Erskine Park carries more bushfire risk (82 vs 0); Minchinbury carries more crime risk (79 vs 46).
| Erskine Park | Minchinbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 82/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 46/100 | High 79/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 12 within 5 km | 16 within 5 km |
Schools
| Erskine Park | Minchinbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 Western Sydney University - Penrith, 8.7 km | None |
Schools in Erskine Park
- James Erskine Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Erskine Park High School Government · Secondary below peers
Schools in Minchinbury
- Minchinbury Public School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Erskine Park | Minchinbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 same for both | |
| Childcare | 6 | 9 |
| GPs | 2 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 1 same for both | |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 3 |
| Waterways | 2 | 3 |
Mobility
Erskine Park sits further from the CBD (44.2 km vs 40.5 km).
| Erskine Park | Minchinbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 50/100 | 73/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 44.2 km +8% vs other | 40.5 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 47 min | 39 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 143.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 101.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 2759 | 0.3% postcode 2770 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 55 postcode 2759 | 37 postcode 2770 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (61.6%).
Setting
| Erskine Park | Minchinbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 63 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 67 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 37.0 km | 35.8 km |
NBN connectivity
| Erskine Park | Minchinbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 75/100 | 90/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 3% 2,236 premises | 53% 2,247 premises |
Climate
| Erskine Park | Minchinbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 822 mm | 931 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | — | 28.9°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | — | 6.9°C |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Erskine Park | Minchinbury | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.55 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Erskine Park | Minchinbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,547/yr | $1,157/yr |
| Council | Penrith | Blacktown |
Federal electorate
| Erskine Park | Minchinbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Mcmahon same for both | |
| Member | Chris Bowen same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Erskine Park | Minchinbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Erskine Park
Minchinbury
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Erskine Park
Other comparisons with Minchinbury
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.