Epping Forest vs Nile
Epping Forest is the younger of the two, with a median age of 40 against 48 in Nile. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Epping Forest, most households are people living alone. In Nile, about half of households are people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Epping Forest
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more parks and reserves (14 vs 5)
Weighs schools, house stock, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Epping Forest has cheaper rent ($100/wk vs $200/wk)
- Nile has a bigger rental market to choose from (38% vs 11%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Epping Forest
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (113 min vs 130 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (159.1 km vs 168.8 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Epping Forest
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.
Investors
Epping Forest
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (20.8% vs -21.4%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Epping Forest and Nile drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Nile rents higher ($200/wk vs $100/wk); Nile has more residents (121 vs 87).
| Epping Forest | Nile | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 87 | 121 +39% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +20.8% | -21.4% |
| Median age | 40 | 48 |
| Median household income | $59,384/yr | $75,816/yr +28% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $100/wk | $200/wk +100% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.7%).
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Zoning mix
| Epping Forest | Nile | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 92% | 100% |
| Environmental | 7% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Epping Forest | Nile | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 184 across Northern Midlands same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +104% same for both | |
Ranking within TAS
| Epping Forest | Nile | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 35% of TAS | Higher than 66% of TAS |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 77% of TAS | Higher than 36% of TAS |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | — | Higher than 8% of TAS |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 21% of TAS | Higher than 30% of TAS |
Liveability
Epping Forest is more walkable (10 vs 0).
| Epping Forest | Nile | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
| Epping Forest | Nile | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 38/100 | Low 39/100 |
| Crime | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Epping Forest | Nile | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Epping Forest | Nile | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 5 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 0 | 2 |
Mobility
Nile sits further from the CBD (168.8 km vs 159.1 km).
| Epping Forest | Nile | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 10/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Hobart | 159.1 km | 168.8 km +6% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 113 min | 130 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.0% postcode 7211 | 0.2% postcode 7212 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 13 postcode 7211 | 34 postcode 7212 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (84.3%).
Setting
| Epping Forest | Nile | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 193 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 237 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Epping Forest | Nile | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 16/100 | 25/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 13 premises | 0% 56 premises |
Climate
| Epping Forest | Nile | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 676 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 24.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 3.1°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Epping Forest | Nile | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,704/yr same for both | |
| Council | Northern Midlands same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Epping Forest | Nile | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Lyons same for both | |
| Member | Rebecca White same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Epping Forest | Nile | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $20,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Epping Forest
Other comparisons with Nile
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.