Emu Creek vs Glenaven
Glenaven is the younger of the two, with a median age of 43 against 50 in Emu Creek. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Glenaven, most households are people living alone. On these figures, Glenaven tends to suit people living alone and families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Emu Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is already more of a family suburb (72% vs 45%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Emu Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (15% vs 47%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Emu Creek
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (16% vs 32%)
- has cheaper rent ($260/wk vs $285/wk)
- But Glenaven has a bigger rental market to choose from (22% vs 7%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Glenaven
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (135 min vs 145 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (163.5 km vs 173.5 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Glenaven
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more residents already 65 and over (22% vs 17%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Emu Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (41.2% vs -13.9%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Emu Creek and Glenaven drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Emu Creek has higher household incomes ($86,632 vs $46,800); Emu Creek has more residents (113 vs 68).
| Emu Creek | Glenaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 113 +40% vs other | 68 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +41.2% | -13.9% |
| Median age | 50 | 43 |
| Median household income | $86,632/yr +46% vs other | $46,800/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $260/wk | $285/wk +10% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (32.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.5%).
Property market
| Emu Creek | Glenaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,110,000 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Development activity
| Emu Creek | Glenaven | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,513 across Toowoomba same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -25% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Emu Creek | Glenaven | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 60% of QLD | Higher than 10% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 39% of QLD | Higher than 56% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 17% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 31% of QLD | Higher than 37% of QLD |
Liveability
| Emu Creek | Glenaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
| Emu Creek | Glenaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 36/100 | Low 37/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Emu Creek | Glenaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Emu Creek | Glenaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 11 | 4 |
Mobility
Emu Creek sits further from the CBD (173.5 km vs 163.5 km).
| Emu Creek | Glenaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 173.5 km +6% vs other | 163.5 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 145 min | 135 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.2% postcode 4355 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 68 postcode 4355 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.0%).
Setting
| Emu Creek | Glenaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 380 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 542 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Emu Creek | Glenaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 23/100 | 27/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 35 premises | 0% 27 premises |
Climate
| Emu Creek | Glenaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 577 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 31.0°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 3.9°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Emu Creek | Glenaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,618/yr same for both | |
| Council | Toowoomba same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Emu Creek | Glenaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Maranoa same for both | |
| Member | David Littleproud same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Emu Creek | Glenaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Emu Creek
Other comparisons with Glenaven
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.