Eimeo vs Bucasia
Comparing Eimeo and Bucasia, QLD: Bucasia is more walkable (38 vs 22); Bucasia has more residents (4,915 vs 3,285); and Eimeo has higher household incomes ($119,808 vs $104,260).
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Too close to call
Nothing among the 6 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Bucasia
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (38/100 vs 22/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Bucasia
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (2 vs 0)
- is more walkable (38/100 vs 22/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Eimeo and Bucasia drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Bucasia has more residents (4,915 vs 3,285); Eimeo has higher household incomes ($119,808 vs $104,260).
| Eimeo | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,285 | 4,915 +50% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +1.7% | +3.0% |
| Median age | 36 | 35 |
| Median household income | $119,808/yr +13% vs other | $104,260/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $390/wk +3% vs other | $380/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Eimeo | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $669,500 | $685,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $209,500 |
| Median land price | $752,000 | $680,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 26 days from 47 sales | 28 days from 62 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
47 vs 75 sales
45 vs 97 sales
9 vs 6 sales
Development activity
| Eimeo | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 574 across Mackay same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -6% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Eimeo | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 5.2% $700/wk on $699K | 5.3% $710/wk on $700K |
| Units | — | 14.5% $600/wk on $215K |
Ranking within QLD
| Eimeo | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 90% of QLD | Higher than 77% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 79% of QLD | Higher than 84% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 40% of QLD | Higher than 46% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 82% of QLD | Higher than 80% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 95% of QLD same for both | |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 100% of QLD |
Liveability
Bucasia is more walkable (38 vs 22); Eimeo scores higher overall (58 vs 51).
| Eimeo | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 58/100 | 51/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
| Eimeo | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 45/100 | Moderate 53/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | High 81/100 | None 0/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Eimeo | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
Schools in Eimeo
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Bucasia
- Bucasia State School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Eimeo | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 7 |
| Childcare | 0 | 2 |
| GPs | 0 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Beaches | 1 same for both | |
| Waterways | 2 | 0 |
Mobility
| Eimeo | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 22/100 | 38/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 978.4 km | 979.2 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 676 min | 679 min |
| Public transport score | 21/100 Bus | 44/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 2.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 15.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 3 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 4740 | 0.3% postcode 4750 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 56 postcode 4740 | 67 postcode 4750 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (87.4%).
Setting
| Eimeo | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 4 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | -1 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 1.1 km 1.5 km to a named beach | 1.5 km 1.6 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Eimeo | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 73/100 | 72/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fibre to the node |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 52% 1,381 premises | 49% 2,031 premises |
Climate
| Eimeo | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,633 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.6°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 14.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Eimeo | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Eimeo | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,873/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mackay same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Eimeo | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Dawson same for both | |
| Member | Andrew Willcox same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Eimeo | Bucasia | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Eimeo
Other comparisons with Bucasia
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.