Edmondson Park vs Leppington
In both, most households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Edmondson Park is closer to the city centre: 44.8 km, against 51.9 km.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Edmondson Park has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
- Leppington has more parks and reserves (6 vs 3)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Edmondson Park
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (74/100 vs 40/100)
- has a shorter drive in (41 min vs 49 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (44.8 km vs 51.9 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Edmondson Park
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (17% vs 5%)
- is more walkable (74/100 vs 40/100)
- carries lower crime risk (60/100 vs 70/100)
- But Leppington has more residents already 65 and over (11% vs 4%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Edmondson Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (431.9% vs 169.4%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Edmondson Park and Leppington drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Edmondson Park has more residents (12,080 vs 9,423); Edmondson Park has higher household incomes ($133,224 vs $118,300).
| Edmondson Park | Leppington | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,080 +22% vs other | 9,423 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +431.9% | +169.4% |
| Median age | 31 | 32 |
| Median household income | $133,224/yr +11% vs other | $118,300/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $550/wk same for both | |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.3%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (8.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Edmondson Park | Leppington | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,320,000 | $1,230,000 |
| Median unit price | $720,000 | — |
| Median land price | — | $806,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 28 days from 98 sales | 33 days from 139 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
21 vs 24 sales
88 vs 126 sales
23 vs 44 sales
5 vs 6 sales
Zoning mix
Leppington has more rural and farming land (41% vs 8%); Edmondson Park has more land zoned for conservation (17% vs 4%).
| Edmondson Park | Leppington | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 49% | 34% |
| Rural and farming | 8% | 41% |
| Environmental | 17% | 4% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 9% | 11% |
| Parks and recreation | 10% | 4% |
| Commercial | 6% | 1% |
| Other and special use | 0% | 3% |
| Industrial | 1% | 3% |
| Planning zones cover 100% of Edmondson Park and 99% of Leppington. The rest is unzoned land such as water or road reserve. | ||
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Edmondson Park | Leppington | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 2,229 across Liverpool | 1,671 across Camden |
| Approvals change year on year | +28% | -21% |
Gross rental yield
| Edmondson Park | Leppington | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.4% $865/wk on $1.32M | 3.4% $855/wk on $1.3M |
| Units | 4.8% $690/wk on $745K | — |
Ranking within NSW
| Edmondson Park | Leppington | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 56% of NSW | Higher than 47% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 90% of NSW | — |
| Schools | — | Higher than 26% of NSW |
| Walkability | Higher than 90% of NSW | Higher than 78% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 78% of NSW | — |
| EV adoption | Higher than 95% of NSW | Higher than 90% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 100% of NSW | Higher than 98% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 39% of NSW | Higher than 40% of NSW |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 58% of NSW | — |
Liveability
Edmondson Park is more walkable (74 vs 40); Edmondson Park scores higher overall (70 vs 44).
| Edmondson Park | Leppington | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A | C |
| Score | 70/100 | 44/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
Leppington carries more bushfire risk (31 vs 15); Leppington carries more crime risk (70 vs 60).
| Edmondson Park | Leppington | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 15/100 | Low 31/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 60/100 | High 70/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 6 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Edmondson Park | Leppington | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 | 3 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 2 |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 50 Scott Street Liverpool, 6.9 km | None |
Schools in Edmondson Park
- St Francis Catholic College Catholic · Combined above peers
- Edmondson Park Public School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Leppington
- Leppington Anglican College Independent · Combined below peers
- Leppington Public School Government · Primary below peers
- Amity College Leppington Campus Independent · Primary
Amenities in the suburb
| Edmondson Park | Leppington | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 | 3 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 3 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 6 |
| Childcare | 12 | 13 |
| GPs | 1 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 3 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 3 | 5 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 11 | 9 |
Mobility
Leppington sits further from the CBD (51.9 km vs 44.8 km).
| Edmondson Park | Leppington | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 74/100 | 40/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 44.8 km | 51.9 km +16% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 41 min | 49 min |
| Public transport score | 92/100 Rail · Bus | 91/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 133.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 205.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.5% postcode 2174 | 1.6% postcode 2179 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 63 postcode 2174 | — postcode 2179 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (51.9%).
Setting
| Edmondson Park | Leppington | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 59 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 105 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 25.4 km | 30.7 km |
NBN connectivity
| Edmondson Park | Leppington | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 100/100 | 99/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 99% 4,413 premises | 95% 5,439 premises |
Climate
| Edmondson Park | Leppington | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 909 mm | 817 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.7°C | 29.4°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.4°C | 4.2°C |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Edmondson Park | Leppington | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.8 µg/m³ | 6.7 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | 18.2 µg/m³ | 16.9 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | 0.72 pphm | 0.37 pphm |
Council rates
| Edmondson Park | Leppington | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,322/yr | $1,504/yr |
| Council | Liverpool | Camden |
Federal electorate
| Edmondson Park | Leppington | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Werriwa | Hume |
| Member | Anne Maree Stanley | Angus Taylor |
| Party | Australian Labor Party | Liberal |
First Home Owner Grant
| Edmondson Park | Leppington | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Edmondson Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Edmondson Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.