Eden Creek vs Smiths Creek
In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Smiths Creek: a median of $1.95 million, against $920,000 in Eden Creek, though rent is higher in Eden Creek. On these figures, Eden Creek tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget, while Smiths Creek suits people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Too close to call
Nothing among the 4 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs schools, house stock, parks, and childcare.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Eden Creek has cheaper houses ($920,000 vs $1,950,000)
- Smiths Creek leaves households under less mortgage stress (19% vs 25%)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Smiths Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($0/wk vs $300/wk)
Weighs rent.
Commuting to the city
Eden Creek
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (513 min vs 523 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (754.5 km vs 762 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Eden Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more residents already 65 and over (32% vs 25%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Eden Creek and Smiths Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Eden Creek rents higher ($300/wk vs $0/wk); Eden Creek has more residents (136 vs 55).
| Eden Creek | Smiths Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 136 +60% vs other | 55 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -9.3% | -11.3% |
| Median age | 58 | 57 |
| Median household income | $53,456/yr | $69,316/yr +30% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $300/wk (not reported on the other side) | — |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (29.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.3%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Eden Creek | Smiths Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $920,000 | $1,950,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
| Eden Creek | Smiths Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 99% | 98% |
| Environmental | 1% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Eden Creek | Smiths Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 25 across Kyogle same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +0% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Eden Creek | Smiths Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 45% of NSW | Higher than 84% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 13% of NSW | Higher than 32% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 51% of NSW | Higher than 12% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 25% of NSW | Higher than 6% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 12% of NSW | Higher than 11% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 25% of NSW | Higher than 6% of NSW |
Liveability
| Eden Creek | Smiths Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Eden Creek carries more bushfire risk (23 vs 0).
| Eden Creek | Smiths Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 23/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | High 82/100 | — |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Eden Creek | Smiths Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Eden Creek | Smiths Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 4 same for both | |
Mobility
Smiths Creek sits further from the CBD (762 km vs 754.5 km).
| Eden Creek | Smiths Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 6/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 754.5 km | 762 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 513 min | 523 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.1% postcode 2474 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 71 postcode 2474 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (85.0%).
Setting
| Eden Creek | Smiths Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 158 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 156 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Eden Creek | Smiths Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 16/100 | 15/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 69 premises | 0% 35 premises |
Climate
| Eden Creek | Smiths Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,016 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Eden Creek | Smiths Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,264/yr same for both | |
| Council | Kyogle same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Eden Creek | Smiths Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Page same for both | |
| Member | Kevin Hogan same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Eden Creek | Smiths Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.