Echunga vs Mount Barker
Mount Barker is the younger of the two, with a median age of 36 against 41 in Echunga. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Echunga, most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Echunga: a median of $1.13 million, against $821,000 in Mount Barker, though rent is higher in Mount Barker. On these figures, Echunga tends to suit couples, while Mount Barker suits people living alone and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Echunga carries lower crime risk (15/100 vs 59/100)
- Mount Barker has more childcare (18 vs 2)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Mount Barker
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper land ($730,000 vs $1,700,000)
- has cheaper houses ($821,250 vs $1,127,250)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Echunga
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (15% vs 22%)
- has cheaper rent ($320/wk vs $350/wk)
- But Mount Barker has a bigger rental market to choose from (31% vs 11%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Mount Barker
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (70/100 vs 17/100)
- has a shorter drive in (33 min vs 42 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Mount Barker
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (9 vs 0)
- is more walkable (70/100 vs 17/100)
- But Echunga carries lower crime risk (15/100 vs 59/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Mount Barker
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (32.4% vs 9.9%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Echunga and Mount Barker drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mount Barker has more residents (18,330 vs 1,219); Echunga has higher household incomes ($108,680 vs $84,448).
| Echunga | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,219 | 18,330 +1404% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +9.9% | +32.4% |
| Median age | 41 | 36 |
| Median household income | $108,680/yr +22% vs other | $84,448/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $320/wk | $350/wk +9% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.7%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.9%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Echunga | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,127,250 | $821,250 |
| Median unit price | — | $590,000 |
| Median land price | $1,700,000 | $730,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 60 days from 8 sales | 27 days from 421 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
10 vs 311 sales
9 vs 266 sales
Zoning mix
Echunga has more rural and farming land (98% vs 38%).
| Echunga | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 98% | 38% |
| Residential | 1% | 53% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 0% | 4% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 2% |
| Industrial | 0% | 1% |
| Commercial | 0% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Echunga | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 657 across Mount Barker same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -7% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Echunga | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 4.1% $640/wk on $815K |
| Units | — | 6.0% $625/wk on $545K |
Ranking within SA
| Echunga | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 7% of SA | Higher than 3% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 86% of SA | Higher than 59% of SA |
| Schools | — | Higher than 9% of SA |
| Walkability | Higher than 70% of SA | Higher than 88% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 97% of SA | Higher than 95% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 92% of SA | Higher than 80% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 56% of SA | Higher than 92% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 63% of SA |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 97% of SA |
Liveability
Mount Barker is more walkable (70 vs 17); Echunga scores higher overall (58 vs 34).
| Echunga | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | C |
| Score | 58/100 | 34/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
Mount Barker carries more crime risk (59 vs 15); Mount Barker carries more flood risk (54 vs 16).
| Echunga | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 65/100 | Moderate 53/100 |
| Crime | Low 15/100 | Moderate 59/100 |
| Flood | Low 16/100 | Moderate 54/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 4 within 5 km |
Schools
| Echunga | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 8 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 3 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 4 |
Schools in Echunga
- Echunga Primary and Preschool Government · Primary above peers
Schools in Mount Barker
- Cornerstone College Independent · Secondary at peers
- Mount Barker High School Government · Secondary at peers
- St Francis de Sales College Catholic · Combined at peers
- Mount Barker Primary School Government · Primary below peers
- Mount Barker South Primary School Government · Primary below peers
- Mount Barker Waldorf School Independent · Combined below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Echunga | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 6 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 17 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 8 |
| Childcare | 2 | 18 |
| GPs | 0 | 9 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 7 |
| Hospitals | 0 | 1 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 10 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 5 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 0 | 4 |
Mobility
| Echunga | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 17/100 | 70/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 36 km +5% vs other | 34.3 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 42 min | 33 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.8% postcode 5153 | 1.1% postcode 5251 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 86 postcode 5153 | 82 postcode 5251 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (76.0%).
Setting
| Echunga | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 397 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 328 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 27.0 km | 32.0 km |
NBN connectivity
| Echunga | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 79/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 464 premises | 61% 10,696 premises |
Climate
| Echunga | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 730 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 27.8°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 5.7°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Echunga | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 1.12 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Echunga | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,485/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mount Barker same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Echunga | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Mayo same for both | |
| Member | Rebekha Sharkie same for both | |
| Party | Centre Alliance same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Echunga | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Echunga
Other comparisons with Mount Barker
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.