Echunga vs Jupiter Creek
Echunga is the younger of the two, with a median age of 41 against 48 in Jupiter Creek. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families.
Echunga is a larger, more established community of 1,219 people with notably lower crime risk at 15 compared to Jupiter Creek's 32, making it feel safer day-to-day. Jupiter Creek offers higher median household income at $119,860 versus Echunga's $108,680, and sits in a slightly higher socio-economic decile, though it's a much smaller locality of 231 people. Both are rural South Australian suburbs; Echunga has a walkability score of 17 while Jupiter Creek scores 0, so neither offers urban convenience, but Echunga is slightly closer to the CBD at 36 km. If you value community size, safety, and some local walkability, Echunga may suit you better; if income levels and socio-economic standing matter most, Jupiter Creek edges ahead despite its isolation and higher bushfire risk.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Echunga
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (15/100 vs 32/100)
- has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Echunga
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (17/100 vs 0/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (36 km vs 39.9 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Echunga
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (17/100 vs 0/100)
- carries lower crime risk (15/100 vs 32/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Echunga
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (9.9% vs -3.8%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Echunga and Jupiter Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Echunga has more residents (1,219 vs 231); Jupiter Creek skews older (48 vs 41).
| Echunga | Jupiter Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,219 +81% vs other | 231 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +9.9% | -3.8% |
| Median age | 41 | 48 |
| Median household income | $108,680/yr | $119,860/yr +10% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $320/wk | $345/wk +8% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.7%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Echunga | Jupiter Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,127,250 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $1,700,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 60 days from 8 sales | — |
Zoning mix
Jupiter Creek has more land zoned for conservation (21% vs 0%); Echunga has more rural and farming land (98% vs 79%).
| Echunga | Jupiter Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 98% | 79% |
| Environmental | 0% | 21% |
| Residential | 1% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Echunga | Jupiter Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 657 across Mount Barker same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -7% same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Echunga | Jupiter Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 7% of SA | — |
| Income | Higher than 86% of SA | Higher than 92% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 70% of SA | Higher than 50% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 97% of SA | — |
| EV adoption | Higher than 92% of SA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 56% of SA | Higher than 48% of SA |
Liveability
Echunga is more walkable (17 vs 0).
| Echunga | Jupiter Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | — |
| Score | 58/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
Jupiter Creek carries more crime risk (32 vs 15).
| Echunga | Jupiter Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 65/100 | High 71/100 |
| Crime | Low 15/100 | Low 32/100 |
| Flood | Low 16/100 | — |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Echunga | Jupiter Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Echunga
- Echunga Primary and Preschool Government · Primary above peers
Schools in Jupiter Creek
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Echunga | Jupiter Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 1 |
| Childcare | 2 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
Jupiter Creek sits further from the CBD (39.9 km vs 36 km).
| Echunga | Jupiter Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 17/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 36 km | 39.9 km +11% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 42 min | 43 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.8% postcode 5153 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 86 postcode 5153 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (73.8%).
Setting
| Echunga | Jupiter Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 397 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 325 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 27.0 km | 23.4 km |
NBN connectivity
| Echunga | Jupiter Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 29/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 464 premises | 0% 85 premises |
Climate
| Echunga | Jupiter Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 730 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 27.8°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 5.7°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Echunga | Jupiter Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.0 µg/m³ | — |
| PM10 | 17.8 µg/m³ | 19.5 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | 1.12 pphm | 0.34 pphm |
Council rates
| Echunga | Jupiter Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,485/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mount Barker same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Echunga | Jupiter Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Mayo same for both | |
| Member | Rebekha Sharkie same for both | |
| Party | Centre Alliance same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Echunga | Jupiter Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Echunga
Other comparisons with Jupiter Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.