Eastwood vs Marsfield
In both, most households own their home. In Eastwood, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Eastwood tends to suit couples, while Marsfield suits people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Eastwood
ahead on 5 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (14 vs 4)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (53% vs 32%)
- has more schools inside the suburb (5 vs 3)
- But Marsfield carries lower crime risk (31/100 vs 44/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Eastwood
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper units ($745,144 vs $850,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Eastwood
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (96/100 vs 84/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Eastwood has more GPs (12 vs 2)
- Marsfield has more units and townhouses to downsize into (68% vs 47%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Eastwood is growing faster (4.6% vs -6.1%)
- Marsfield returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.2% vs 2.6%)
Weighs house yield, unit yield, and population growth.
Where they sit
Eastwood and Marsfield drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Eastwood has more residents (18,695 vs 12,492).
| Eastwood | Marsfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,695 +33% vs other | 12,492 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +4.6% | -6.1% |
| Median age | 39 same for both | |
| Median household income | $101,140/yr | $101,036/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $450/wk | $475/wk +6% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.5%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (25.9%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Eastwood | Marsfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2,701,000 | $2,522,500 |
| Median unit price | $745,144 | $850,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 28 days from 128 sales | 26 days from 94 sales |
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
94 vs 58 sales
30 vs 20 sales
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
7 vs 5 sales
36 vs 27 sales
53 vs 35 sales
70 vs 41 sales
Zoning mix
Marsfield has more land zoned for conservation (16% vs 3%).
| Eastwood | Marsfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 84% | 57% |
| Environmental | 3% | 16% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 7% | 15% |
| Parks and recreation | 6% | 11% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Eastwood | Marsfield | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,489 across Ryde same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +81% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Eastwood | Marsfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 2.6% $1,200/wk on $2.39M | 4.2% $785/wk on $975K |
| Units | 5.2% $650/wk on $650K | 4.8% $688/wk on $750K |
Ranking within NSW
| Eastwood | Marsfield | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 92% of NSW | Higher than 90% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 69% of NSW same for both | |
| Schools | Higher than 96% of NSW | Higher than 99% of NSW |
| Walkability | Higher than 99% of NSW | Higher than 94% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 7% of NSW | Higher than 9% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 96% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 87% of NSW | Higher than 83% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 9% of NSW | Higher than 82% of NSW |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 74% of NSW | Higher than 56% of NSW |
Liveability
Eastwood scores higher overall (87 vs 74); Eastwood is more walkable (96 vs 84).
| Eastwood | Marsfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A same for both | |
| Score | 87/100 | 74/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Marsfield carries more bushfire risk (70 vs 0); Eastwood carries more crime risk (44 vs 31).
| Eastwood | Marsfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | High 70/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 44/100 | Low 31/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Eastwood | Marsfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 5 | 3 |
| Rated above peers | 4 | 3 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Macquarie University Wallumattagal Campus at North Ryde, 4.1 km | 3 Macquarie University Wallumattagal Campus at North Ryde, 2.1 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 4.0% | 4.8% |
Schools in Eastwood
- Eastwood Heights Public School Government · Primary above peers
- Eastwood Public School Government · Primary above peers
- Marist College Eastwood Catholic · Secondary above peers
- St Kevin's Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary above peers
- Aspect Vern Barnett School, Eastwood Independent · Primary · Special school
Schools in Marsfield
- Epping Boys High School Government · Secondary above peers
- Kent Road Public School Government · Primary above peers
- St Anthony's Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary above peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Eastwood | Marsfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 5 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 37 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 29 | 20 |
| Childcare | 14 | 4 |
| GPs | 12 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 7 | 2 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 5 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 1 same for both | |
| Waterways | 6 | 4 |
Mobility
| Eastwood | Marsfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 96/100 | 84/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 19.9 km +8% vs other | 18.4 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 26 min | 23 min |
| Public transport score | 94/100 Rail · Bus | 94/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 431.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 374.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.6% postcode 2122 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 22 postcode 2122 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (54.0%).
Setting
| Eastwood | Marsfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 73 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 82 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 15.3 km | 13.7 km |
NBN connectivity
| Eastwood | Marsfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 77/100 | 75/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 12% 8,286 premises | 0% 5,483 premises |
Climate
| Eastwood | Marsfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,176 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Eastwood | Marsfield | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.4 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.2 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.23 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Eastwood | Marsfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,216/yr same for both | |
| Council | Ryde same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Eastwood | Marsfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Bennelong same for both | |
| Member | Jerome Laxale same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Eastwood | Marsfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Eastwood
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Eastwood
Other comparisons with Marsfield
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.