Duffy vs Holder
In both, the large majority of households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Duffy, about half of households are couple families.
Duffy and Holder are both affluent ACT suburbs with similar socio-economic standing, but they suit different priorities. Holder has notably better walkability (85 versus 57) and liveability scores (62 versus 42), making it more appealing if you value neighbourhood amenities and pedestrian access. Duffy offers higher household incomes ($134,836 versus $121,576) and significantly cheaper units ($700,000 versus $478,000), though it carries higher crime risk (33 versus 13). Rental yields on houses favour Duffy at 4.3 percent, while weekly rent is slightly lower there too. Both face the same bushfire risk; choose based on whether walkability and safety matter more to you, or income level and investment returns.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Holder
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools inside the suburb (3 vs 1)
- carries lower crime risk (13/100 vs 33/100)
- But Duffy has more separate houses rather than flats (87% vs 75%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Holder
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper units ($478,000 vs $700,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Holder
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (85/100 vs 57/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Holder
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (13/100 vs 33/100)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (25% vs 13%)
- is more walkable (85/100 vs 57/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Duffy
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.3% vs 3.6%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Duffy and Holder drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Duffy has higher household incomes ($134,836 vs $121,576); Holder skews older (41 vs 39).
| Duffy | Holder | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,395 +17% vs other | 2,816 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +7.4% | +8.1% |
| Median age | 39 | 41 |
| Median household income | $134,836/yr +10% vs other | $121,576/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $445/wk | $465/wk +4% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.2%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Duffy | Holder | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $968,750 | $940,000 |
| Median unit price | $700,000 | $478,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 23 days from 25 sales | 21 days from 28 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
18 vs 37 sales
22 vs 28 sales
Development activity
| Duffy | Holder | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 3,750 across Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -48% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Duffy | Holder | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.3% $760/wk on $910K | 3.6% $660/wk on $945K |
| Units | 7.1% $560/wk on $410K | — |
Ranking within ACT
| Duffy | Holder | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 68% of ACT | Higher than 46% of ACT |
| Schools | — | Higher than 64% of ACT |
| Walkability | Higher than 39% of ACT | Higher than 93% of ACT |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 70% of ACT | Higher than 66% of ACT |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 25% of ACT | Higher than 28% of ACT |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 55% of ACT | Higher than 21% of ACT |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 88% of ACT | — |
Liveability
Holder is more walkable (85 vs 57); Holder scores higher overall (62 vs 42).
| Duffy | Holder | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | B |
| Score | 42/100 | 62/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Duffy carries more crime risk (33 vs 13); Holder carries more flood risk (37 vs 16).
| Duffy | Holder | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 99/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 33/100 | Low 13/100 |
| Flood | Low 16/100 | Low 37/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Duffy | Holder | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 3 |
| Rated above peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 Australian National University, 9.9 km | 2 UNSW Canberra, 9.0 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.2% | 1.6% |
Schools in Duffy
- Duffy Primary School Government · Primary above peers
Schools in Holder
- St Jude's Primary School Catholic · Primary above peers
- Canberra Montessori School Independent · Primary below peers
- Communities@Work Galilee School - Holder Campus Independent · Secondary · Special school
Amenities in the suburb
| Duffy | Holder | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 same for both | |
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 1 |
| Childcare | 2 | 4 |
| GPs | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
| Duffy | Holder | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 57/100 | 85/100 |
| Distance to Canberra | 14.4 km +4% vs other | 13.8 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 19 min | 18 min |
| Public transport score | 78/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 82.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 65.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 4.0% postcode 2611 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 52 postcode 2611 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (71.2%).
Setting
| Duffy | Holder | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 594 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 576 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Duffy | Holder | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 46/100 | 47/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 2% 1,464 premises | 3% 1,329 premises |
Climate
| Duffy | Holder | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 686 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.2°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 0.9°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Duffy | Holder | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.4 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.1 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Duffy | Holder | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $3,105/yr same for both | |
| Council | Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Duffy | Holder | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Bean same for both | |
| Member | David Smith same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Duffy | Holder | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | Not offered same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | None same for both | |
Tags
Holder
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Duffy
Other comparisons with Holder
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.