Dover Gardens vs Seacliff Park
In both, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. Houses cost more in Seacliff Park: a median of $1.18 million, against $1 million in Dover Gardens, and rent is higher there too. Dover Gardens is closer to the city centre: 14.2 km, against 19.4 km.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Seacliff Park
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (48/100 vs 62/100)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (84% vs 68%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Seacliff Park
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has cheaper units ($665,000 vs $885,000)
- has cheaper land ($948,000 vs $1,170,000)
- But Dover Gardens has cheaper houses ($1,000,000 vs $1,175,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Dover Gardens
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (35% vs 21%)
- has cheaper rent ($339/wk vs $370/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Dover Gardens
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (14.2 km vs 19.4 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Dover Gardens has more units and townhouses to downsize into (32% vs 16%)
- Seacliff Park carries lower crime risk (48/100 vs 62/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Dover Gardens
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.0% vs 3.2%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Dover Gardens and Seacliff Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Seacliff Park has higher household incomes ($88,036 vs $73,996); Seacliff Park skews older (41 vs 39).
| Dover Gardens | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,062 +14% vs other | 2,644 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +6.6% | +8.4% |
| Median age | 39 | 41 |
| Median household income | $73,996/yr | $88,036/yr +19% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $339/wk | $370/wk +9% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (8.9%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Dover Gardens | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,000,000 | $1,175,000 |
| Median unit price | $885,000 | $665,000 |
| Median land price | $1,170,000 | $948,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 19 days from 21 sales | 26 days from 27 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
55 vs 47 sales
8 vs 28 sales
Zoning mix
Seacliff Park has more land zoned for conservation (39% vs 0%).
| Dover Gardens | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 98% | 53% |
| Environmental | 0% | 39% |
| Industrial | 2% | 5% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Dover Gardens | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 809 across Marion same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -31% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Dover Gardens | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.0% $750/wk on $969K | 3.2% $750/wk on $1.2M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Dover Gardens | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 44% of SA | Higher than 42% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 48% of SA | Higher than 67% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 89% of SA | Higher than 88% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 42% of SA | Higher than 68% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 85% of SA | Higher than 84% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 90% of SA | Higher than 86% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 58% of SA | Higher than 23% of SA |
Liveability
Seacliff Park scores higher overall (65 vs 44).
| Dover Gardens | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | B |
| Score | 44/100 | 65/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 | advantaged area decile 8/10 |
Risk profile
Dover Gardens carries more flood risk (92 vs 64); Dover Gardens carries more crime risk (62 vs 48).
| Dover Gardens | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 62/100 | Moderate 48/100 |
| Flood | High 92/100 | Moderate 64/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km | 3 within 5 km |
Schools
| Dover Gardens | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 2 Bedford Park, 3.0 km | 2 Bedford Park, 4.3 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.5% | 2.0% |
Amenities in the suburb
| Dover Gardens | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 same for both | |
| Childcare | 2 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
Seacliff Park sits further from the CBD (19.4 km vs 14.2 km).
| Dover Gardens | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 72/100 | 70/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 14.2 km | 19.4 km +37% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 23 min | 25 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 74.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 86.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.4% postcode 5048 | 1.4% postcode 5049 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 57 postcode 5048 | 67 postcode 5049 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (76.6%).
Setting
| Dover Gardens | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 28 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 118 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 1.9 km | 1.4 km |
NBN connectivity
| Dover Gardens | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 76/100 | 75/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 2% 1,511 premises | 2% 1,195 premises |
Climate
| Dover Gardens | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 394 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.8°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Dover Gardens | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.0 µg/m³ | — |
| PM10 | 17.8 µg/m³ | 19.5 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | 1.12 pphm | 0.34 pphm |
Council rates
| Dover Gardens | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,782/yr same for both | |
| Council | Marion same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Dover Gardens | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Boothby same for both | |
| Member | Louise Miller-Frost same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Dover Gardens | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Dover Gardens
Seacliff Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Dover Gardens
Other comparisons with Seacliff Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.