Dixalea vs Dululu
Dixalea is the younger of the two, with a median age of 39 against 55 in Dululu. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Dixalea, most households are couple families. In Dululu, most households are people living alone. On these figures, Dixalea tends to suit young adults and couples, while Dululu suits people living alone and older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Dixalea
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is already more of a family suburb (74% vs 38%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Dululu
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (27% vs 40%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Dixalea
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (4% vs 12%)
- has cheaper rent ($75/wk vs $150/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Dixalea
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (631.7 km vs 642.7 km)
- has a shorter drive in (440 min vs 446 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Dululu
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more residents already 65 and over (22% vs 13%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Dixalea
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (10.9% vs -23.0%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Dixalea and Dululu drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Dululu rents higher ($150/wk vs $75/wk); Dixalea has higher household incomes ($102,336 vs $67,132).
| Dixalea | Dululu | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 102 +5% vs other | 97 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +10.9% | -23.0% |
| Median age | 39 | 55 |
| Median household income | $102,336/yr +34% vs other | $67,132/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $75/wk | $150/wk +100% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (26.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.7%).
Development activity
| Dixalea | Dululu | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 17 across Banana same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -93% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Dixalea | Dululu | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 76% of QLD | Higher than 33% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 26% of QLD | Higher than 27% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 19% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 9% of QLD same for both | |
Liveability
| Dixalea | Dululu | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
| Dixalea | Dululu | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 40/100 | Moderate 42/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Dixalea | Dululu | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Dixalea | Dululu | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 6 | 2 |
Mobility
Dululu sits further from the CBD (642.7 km vs 631.7 km).
| Dixalea | Dululu | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 631.7 km | 642.7 km +2% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 440 min | 446 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.2% postcode 4702 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 58 postcode 4702 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (68.3%).
Setting
| Dixalea | Dululu | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 117 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 128 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Dixalea | Dululu | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 15/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 21 premises | 0% 23 premises |
Council rates
| Dixalea | Dululu | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,081/yr same for both | |
| Council | Banana same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Dixalea | Dululu | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Flynn same for both | |
| Member | Colin Boyce same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Dixalea | Dululu | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Dixalea
Other comparisons with Dululu
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.