Dirty Creek vs Halfway Creek
Dirty Creek is the younger of the two, with a median age of 32 against 48 in Halfway Creek. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Dirty Creek, about half of households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Dirty Creek: a median of $728,000, against $400,000 in Halfway Creek, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Dirty Creek tends to suit young adults, people living alone, and families with children, while Halfway Creek suits buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Halfway Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is already more of a family suburb (59% vs 45%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Halfway Creek
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- has cheaper houses ($400,000 vs $727,500)
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (21% vs 31%)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Halfway Creek
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (27% vs 34%)
- has cheaper rent ($325/wk vs $385/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Dirty Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (569.2 km vs 575.8 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Halfway Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more residents already 65 and over (21% vs 13%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Dirty Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (16.5% vs -3.9%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Dirty Creek and Halfway Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Halfway Creek has more residents (246 vs 106); Halfway Creek skews older (48 vs 32).
| Dirty Creek | Halfway Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 106 | 246 +132% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +16.5% | -3.9% |
| Median age | 32 | 48 |
| Median household income | $58,500/yr | $62,816/yr +7% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $385/wk +16% vs other | $325/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Dirty Creek | Halfway Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $727,500 | $400,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
Halfway Creek has more land zoned for conservation (30% vs 16%); Dirty Creek has more rural and farming land (80% vs 67%).
| Dirty Creek | Halfway Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 80% | 67% |
| Environmental | 16% | 30% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 4% | 3% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Dirty Creek | Halfway Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 356 across Coffs Harbour | 246 across Clarence Valley |
| Approvals change year on year | +61% | -80% |
Ranking within NSW
| Dirty Creek | Halfway Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 28% of NSW | Higher than 11% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 20% of NSW | Higher than 25% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 61% of NSW | Higher than 51% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 48% of NSW | Higher than 88% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 53% of NSW | Higher than 19% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 62% of NSW | Higher than 44% of NSW |
Liveability
| Dirty Creek | Halfway Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
| Dirty Creek | Halfway Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 80/100 | High 75/100 |
| Crime | High 91/100 | High 97/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Dirty Creek | Halfway Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Dirty Creek | Halfway Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 2 |
| Childcare | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 2 |
| Waterways | 10 | 31 |
Mobility
Halfway Creek sits further from the CBD (575.8 km vs 569.2 km).
| Dirty Creek | Halfway Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 12/100 | 6/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 569.2 km | 575.8 km +1% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 373 min | 376 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 2456 | 0.2% postcode 2460 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 59 postcode 2456 | 60 postcode 2460 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.0%).
Setting
| Dirty Creek | Halfway Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 103 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 95 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 7.1 km | 12.8 km |
NBN connectivity
| Dirty Creek | Halfway Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 28/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 56 premises | 0% 108 premises |
Climate
| Dirty Creek | Halfway Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,827 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Dirty Creek | Halfway Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,437/yr | $1,380/yr |
| Council | Coffs Harbour | Clarence Valley |
Federal electorate
| Dirty Creek | Halfway Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Page same for both | |
| Member | Kevin Hogan same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Dirty Creek | Halfway Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Halfway Creek
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Dirty Creek
Other comparisons with Halfway Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.