Dewhurst vs Pakenham Upper
Pakenham Upper is the younger of the two, with a median age of 44 against 50 in Dewhurst. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. On these figures, Dewhurst tends to suit older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Pakenham Upper
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (6 vs 0)
- carries lower crime risk (35/100 vs 51/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Pakenham Upper
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($255/wk vs $300/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Dewhurst
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (59.8 km vs 67 km)
- has a shorter drive in (57 min vs 62 min)
- But Pakenham Upper is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Pakenham Upper
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
- carries lower crime risk (35/100 vs 51/100)
- But Dewhurst has more residents already 65 and over (33% vs 17%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Pakenham Upper
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (2.0% vs -7.9%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Dewhurst and Pakenham Upper drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Pakenham Upper has more residents (1,196 vs 151); Dewhurst rents higher ($300/wk vs $255/wk).
| Dewhurst | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 151 | 1,196 +692% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -7.9% | +2.0% |
| Median age | 50 | 44 |
| Median household income | $122,148/yr | $134,836/yr +10% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $300/wk +15% vs other | $255/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.5%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Dewhurst | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $1,632,500 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $1,375,000 |
Zoning mix
Dewhurst has more land zoned for conservation (97% vs 58%); Pakenham Upper has more rural and farming land (35% vs 0%).
| Dewhurst | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 97% | 58% |
| Rural and farming | 0% | 35% |
| Parks and recreation | 1% | 6% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 2% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Dewhurst | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,323 across Cardinia same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +13% same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Dewhurst | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 92% of VIC | Higher than 95% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 64% of VIC | Higher than 69% of VIC |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 81% of VIC | Higher than 69% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 72% of VIC | Higher than 39% of VIC |
Liveability
Pakenham Upper is more walkable (10 vs 0).
| Dewhurst | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | C |
| Score | — | 46/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Pakenham Upper carries more flood risk (39 vs 0); Dewhurst carries more crime risk (51 vs 35).
| Dewhurst | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 82/100 | High 99/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 51/100 | Low 35/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 | Low 39/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Dewhurst | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Dewhurst | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 6 |
| Waterways | 2 | 9 |
Mobility
Pakenham Upper sits further from the CBD (67 km vs 59.8 km).
| Dewhurst | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 10/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 59.8 km | 67 km +12% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 57 min | 62 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.2% postcode 3808 | 0.8% postcode 3810 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 56 postcode 3808 | 43 postcode 3810 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (65.7%).
Setting
| Dewhurst | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 200 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 189 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 26.4 km | 24.0 km |
NBN connectivity
| Dewhurst | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 29/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 61 premises | 0% 399 premises |
Climate
| Dewhurst | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 781 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Dewhurst | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 20.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.98 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Dewhurst | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,880/yr same for both | |
| Council | Cardinia same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Dewhurst | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | La Trobe same for both | |
| Member | Jason Wood same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Dewhurst | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Dewhurst
Other comparisons with Pakenham Upper
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.