Denman Prospect vs Wright
In both, most households own their home. In Denman Prospect, most households are couple families. In Wright, about half of homes are flats or apartments. On these figures, Denman Prospect tends to suit families with children and couples, while Wright suits people living alone.
Denman Prospect and Wright are both affluent ACT suburbs with similar socio-economic standing, but they suit different priorities. Denman Prospect has notably higher household incomes at $167,388 yearly and stronger rental yields on houses at 5.8%, though it carries higher flood risk (46/100) and lower walkability (48/100). Wright scores better on liveability (53/100) and walkability (71/100), has no flood risk, and offers slightly lower house prices at $1,285,000 compared to Denman Prospect's $1,230,000. Both are close to the CBD and similarly aged; choose Denman Prospect if income and house investment returns matter most, or Wright if walkability and lifestyle amenity appeal more.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Denman Prospect
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (3 vs 0)
- is already more of a family suburb (70% vs 54%)
- But Wright carries lower crime risk (66/100 vs 77/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Wright
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper units ($505,250 vs $570,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Wright
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (32% vs 15%)
- has cheaper rent ($461/wk vs $498/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Wright
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (71/100 vs 48/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Wright
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (71/100 vs 48/100)
- carries lower crime risk (66/100 vs 77/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Denman Prospect
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (5.9% vs 4.4%)
Weighs house yield and unit yield.
Where they sit
Denman Prospect and Wright drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Wright has more residents (3,808 vs 2,759); Denman Prospect has higher household incomes ($167,388 vs $133,068).
| Denman Prospect | Wright | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,759 | 3,808 +38% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | — | +38.3% |
| Median age | 31 | 32 |
| Median household income | $167,388/yr +21% vs other | $133,068/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $498/wk +7% vs other | $461/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (26.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (25.7%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (12.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Denman Prospect | Wright | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,245,000 | $1,290,000 |
| Median unit price | $570,000 | $505,250 |
| Median land price | $810,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 60 days from 48 sales | 22 days from 14 sales |
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
56 vs 21 sales
86 vs 49 sales
16 vs 10 sales
Development activity
| Denman Prospect | Wright | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 3,750 across Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -48% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Denman Prospect | Wright | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 5.9% $950/wk on $840K | 4.4% $730/wk on $864K |
| Units | 5.6% $595/wk on $549K | 6.0% $580/wk on $500K |
Ranking within ACT
| Denman Prospect | Wright | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 92% of ACT | Higher than 65% of ACT |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 32% of ACT | Higher than 68% of ACT |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 74% of ACT | Higher than 72% of ACT |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 96% of ACT | Higher than 92% of ACT |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 100% of ACT | Higher than 59% of ACT |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 32% of ACT | Higher than 49% of ACT |
Liveability
Wright is more walkable (71 vs 48); Wright scores higher overall (53 vs 41).
| Denman Prospect | Wright | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | B |
| Score | 41/100 | 53/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Denman Prospect carries more flood risk (46 vs 0); Denman Prospect carries more crime risk (77 vs 66).
| Denman Prospect | Wright | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 98/100 | High 100/100 |
| Crime | High 77/100 | Moderate 66/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 46/100 | None 0/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Denman Prospect | Wright | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 2 Australian National University, 8.1 km | 3 Australian National University, 8.7 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 1.7% | 2.5% |
Schools in Denman Prospect
- Evelyn Scott School Government · Combined
Schools in Wright
- Stromlo Forest Anglican College Independent · Combined
Amenities in the suburb
| Denman Prospect | Wright | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 same for both | |
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 2 |
| Childcare | 3 | 0 |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 5 | 2 |
Mobility
| Denman Prospect | Wright | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 48/100 | 71/100 |
| Distance to Canberra | 15.1 km +5% vs other | 14.3 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 22 min | 19 min |
| Public transport score | 77/100 Bus | 75/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 64.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 28.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 4.0% postcode 2611 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 52 postcode 2611 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (74.2%).
Setting
| Denman Prospect | Wright | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 556 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 580 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Denman Prospect | Wright | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 100/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 100% 2,335 premises | 100% 1,876 premises |
Climate
| Denman Prospect | Wright | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 686 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.2°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 0.9°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Denman Prospect | Wright | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.6 µg/m³ | 5.4 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | 11.0 µg/m³ | 14.1 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | 0.41 pphm | — |
Council rates
| Denman Prospect | Wright | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $3,105/yr same for both | |
| Council | Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Denman Prospect | Wright | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Bean same for both | |
| Member | David Smith same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Denman Prospect | Wright | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | Not offered same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | None same for both | |
Tags
Denman Prospect
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Denman Prospect
Other comparisons with Wright
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.