Deniliquin vs Pretty Pine
In both, most households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Deniliquin tends to suit older residents, while Pretty Pine suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Deniliquin
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (14 vs 1)
- has more childcare (7 vs 0)
- has more schools inside the suburb (5 vs 0)
- But Pretty Pine has more separate houses rather than flats (100% vs 89%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Deniliquin
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (20% vs 36%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Deniliquin
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($230/wk vs $255/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Pretty Pine
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (468 min vs 473 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (718.6 km vs 720.7 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Deniliquin
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has more GPs (4 vs 0)
- has more residents already 65 and over (26% vs 15%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Deniliquin and Pretty Pine drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Deniliquin has more residents (7,432 vs 59); Pretty Pine has higher household incomes ($84,500 vs $63,492).
| Deniliquin | Pretty Pine | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,432 +99% vs other | 59 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -5.5% | -6.3% |
| Median age | 47 same for both | |
| Median household income | $63,492/yr | $84,500/yr +33% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $230/wk | $255/wk +11% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.7%).
Property market
| Deniliquin | Pretty Pine | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $417,500 | — |
| Median unit price | $332,500 | — |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 42 days from 5 sales | — |
Zoning mix
| Deniliquin | Pretty Pine | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 95% | 100% |
| Residential | 2% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Deniliquin | Pretty Pine | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 144 across Murray River | 26 across Edward River |
| Approvals change year on year | -16% | +33% |
Gross rental yield
| Deniliquin | Pretty Pine | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.7% $450/wk on $495K | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Deniliquin | Pretty Pine | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 10% of NSW | — |
| Income | Higher than 26% of NSW | Higher than 53% of NSW |
| Schools | Higher than 45% of NSW | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 34% of NSW | Higher than 16% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 89% of NSW | — |
| EV adoption | Higher than 4% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 79% of NSW | Higher than 32% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 94% of NSW | — |
Liveability
| Deniliquin | Pretty Pine | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | D | — |
| Score | 24/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | advantaged area decile 8/10 |
Risk profile
Deniliquin carries more bushfire risk (30 vs 10).
| Deniliquin | Pretty Pine | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 30/100 | Low 10/100 |
| Crime | High 89/100 | High 88/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Deniliquin | Pretty Pine | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 5 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 3 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
Schools in Deniliquin
- St Michael's Parish School Catholic · Primary above peers
- Deniliquin High School Government · Secondary at peers
- Deniliquin North Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Deniliquin South Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Edward Public School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Pretty Pine
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Deniliquin | Pretty Pine | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 5 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 1 |
| Childcare | 7 | 0 |
| GPs | 4 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 2 | 0 |
| Hospitals | 1 | 0 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 6 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 5 | 0 |
| EV chargers | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 45 | 0 |
Mobility
Deniliquin sits further from the CBD (720.7 km vs 718.6 km).
| Deniliquin | Pretty Pine | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Sydney | 720.7 km | 718.6 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 473 min | 468 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.1% postcode 2710 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 56 postcode 2710 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (81.8%).
Setting
| Deniliquin | Pretty Pine | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 93 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 88 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Deniliquin | Pretty Pine | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 72/100 | 23/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 42% 4,559 premises | 0% 25 premises |
Climate
| Deniliquin | Pretty Pine | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 324 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Deniliquin | Pretty Pine | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $996/yr | $1,180/yr |
| Council | Murray River | Edward River |
Federal electorate
| Deniliquin | Pretty Pine | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Farrer same for both | |
| Member | David Farley same for both | |
| Party | One Nation same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Deniliquin | Pretty Pine | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Deniliquin
Pretty Pine
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Deniliquin
Other comparisons with Pretty Pine
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.