Denbarker vs Mount Barker
Denbarker is the younger of the two, with a median age of 41 against 48 in Mount Barker. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Denbarker, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Denbarker tends to suit families with children and couples, while Mount Barker suits older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Denbarker
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (22/100 vs 75/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (63% vs 54%)
- But Mount Barker has more parks and reserves (4 vs 1)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Mount Barker
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (26% vs 35%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Denbarker
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (10% vs 20%)
- has cheaper rent ($125/wk vs $225/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Mount Barker
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (253 min vs 283 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (363.9 km vs 397.5 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Denbarker carries lower crime risk (22/100 vs 75/100)
- Mount Barker has more residents already 65 and over (25% vs 9%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Denbarker
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (24.0% vs 4.2%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Denbarker and Mount Barker drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mount Barker has more residents (2,855 vs 93); Mount Barker rents higher ($225/wk vs $125/wk).
| Denbarker | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 93 | 2,855 +2970% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +24.0% | +4.2% |
| Median age | 41 | 48 |
| Median household income | $67,132/yr +14% vs other | $57,408/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $125/wk | $225/wk +80% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.5%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Denbarker | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $582,500 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $322,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 32 days from 18 sales |
Development activity
| Denbarker | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 37 across Plantagenet same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -57% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Denbarker | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 3.4% $420/wk on $650K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within WA
| Denbarker | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 24% of WA | Higher than 14% of WA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 32% of WA | Higher than 66% of WA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 32% of WA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 41% of WA | Higher than 69% of WA |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 12% of WA |
Liveability
| Denbarker | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | D |
| Score | — | 28/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
Mount Barker carries more crime risk (75 vs 22); Denbarker carries more bushfire risk (72 vs 36).
| Denbarker | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 72/100 | Low 36/100 |
| Crime | Low 22/100 | High 75/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Denbarker | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Denbarker
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Mount Barker
- Mount Barker Community College Government · Combined at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Denbarker | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 4 |
| Childcare | 0 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Hospitals | 0 | 1 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 3 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 3 |
| Waterways | 1 | 2 |
Mobility
Denbarker sits further from the CBD (397.5 km vs 363.9 km).
| Denbarker | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 4/100 |
| Distance to Perth | 397.5 km +8% vs other | 363.9 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 283 min | 253 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 6324 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 35 postcode 6324 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (79.7%).
Setting
| Denbarker | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 193 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 265 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 34.2 km | 46.2 km |
NBN connectivity
| Denbarker | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 18/100 | 47/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 23 premises | 18% 1,498 premises |
Climate
| Denbarker | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 619 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 26.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.9°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Denbarker | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $3,167/yr same for both | |
| Council | Plantagenet same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Denbarker | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | O'connor same for both | |
| Member | Rick Wilson same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Denbarker | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $800,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Mount Barker
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Denbarker
Other comparisons with Mount Barker
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.