Delahey vs Sydenham
Comparing Delahey and Sydenham, VIC: Sydenham is more walkable (89 vs 62); Sydenham carries more crime risk (50 vs 38); and Sydenham has more residents (10,578 vs 8,077).
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Sydenham
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools inside the suburb (4 vs 2)
- has more parks and reserves (12 vs 6)
- has more childcare (10 vs 6)
- But Delahey carries lower crime risk (38/100 vs 50/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Sydenham
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper units ($491,000 vs $595,500)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Sydenham
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (89/100 vs 62/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Sydenham
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (4 vs 0)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (35% vs 24%)
- is more walkable (89/100 vs 62/100)
- But Delahey carries lower crime risk (38/100 vs 50/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Sydenham
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.2% vs 3.6%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Delahey and Sydenham drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Sydenham has more residents (10,578 vs 8,077); Sydenham has higher household incomes ($94,276 vs $77,272).
| Delahey | Sydenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,077 | 10,578 +31% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -3.1% | -2.4% |
| Median age | 39 | 37 |
| Median household income | $77,272/yr | $94,276/yr +22% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $350/wk | $369/wk +5% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (13.4%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (9.9%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Delahey | Sydenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $707,500 | $737,500 |
| Median unit price | $595,500 | $491,000 |
| Median land price | — | $545,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 25 days from 38 sales | 23 days from 68 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
86 vs 87 sales
30 vs 46 sales
Zoning mix
| Delahey | Sydenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 61% | 87% |
| Other and special use | 27% | 3% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 8% same for both | |
| Parks and recreation | 3% | 2% |
| Commercial | 1% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Delahey | Sydenham | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 670 across Brimbank same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +40% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Delahey | Sydenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.6% $505/wk on $725K | 4.2% $530/wk on $650K |
| Units | — | 4.4% $465/wk on $545K |
Ranking within VIC
| Delahey | Sydenham | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 48% of VIC | Higher than 43% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 45% of VIC | Higher than 65% of VIC |
| Schools | — | Higher than 14% of VIC |
| Walkability | Higher than 88% of VIC | Higher than 96% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 45% of VIC | Higher than 74% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 69% of VIC same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 81% of VIC | Higher than 92% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 42% of VIC | Higher than 83% of VIC |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 28% of VIC |
Liveability
Sydenham is more walkable (89 vs 62).
| Delahey | Sydenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 57/100 | 56/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
Sydenham carries more crime risk (50 vs 38).
| Delahey | Sydenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 38/100 | Moderate 50/100 |
| Flood | Low 21/100 | Low 24/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 | Moderate 50/100 |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Delahey | Sydenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 | 4 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 2 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Delahey
- Copperfield College Government · Secondary at peers
- Mackellar Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Sydenham
- Emmaus Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary at peers
- Catholic Regional College Sydenham Catholic · Secondary
- Copperfield College-Sydenham Junior Campus Government · Secondary
- Sydenham - Hillside Primary School Government · Primary
Amenities in the suburb
| Delahey | Sydenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 same for both | |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 12 |
| Childcare | 6 | 10 |
| GPs | 0 | 4 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
| Delahey | Sydenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 62/100 | 89/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 27.6 km +5% vs other | 26.1 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 33 min | 31 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus | 79/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 78.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 128.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.8% postcode 3037 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 39 postcode 3037 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (70.9%).
Setting
| Delahey | Sydenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 95 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 115 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 17.3 km | 19.7 km |
NBN connectivity
| Delahey | Sydenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 72/100 | 82/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 22% 2,983 premises | 51% 4,163 premises |
Climate
| Delahey | Sydenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 518 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 26.7°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.0°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Delahey | Sydenham | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | — same for both | |
| PM10 | 18.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Delahey | Sydenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,847/yr same for both | |
| Council | Brimbank same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Delahey | Sydenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Gorton same for both | |
| Member | Alice Jordan-Baird same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Delahey | Sydenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Delahey
Sydenham
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Delahey
Other comparisons with Sydenham
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.