Daylesford vs Hepburn Springs
Daylesford is the younger of the two, with a median age of 55 against 58 in Hepburn Springs. In both, most households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Daylesford
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (11 vs 0)
- has more childcare (3 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Daylesford
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (67/100 vs 29/100)
- has a shorter drive in (86 min vs 95 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (112.6 km vs 116.1 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Daylesford
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (4 vs 0)
- is more walkable (67/100 vs 29/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Hepburn Springs
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.4% vs 3.2%)
Weighs house yield.
Where they sit
Daylesford and Hepburn Springs drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Daylesford has more residents (2,781 vs 368); Hepburn Springs skews older (58 vs 55).
| Daylesford | Hepburn Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,781 +87% vs other | 368 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +9.1% | — |
| Median age | 55 | 58 |
| Median household income | $61,620/yr | $64,064/yr +4% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $331/wk | $341/wk +3% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.5%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Daylesford | Hepburn Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $820,000 | $760,000 |
| Median unit price | $495,000 | — |
| Median land price | $392,500 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 63 days from 72 sales | 47 days from 7 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
25 vs 5 sales
78 vs 12 sales
Zoning mix
Daylesford has more rural and farming land (54% vs 0%); Hepburn Springs has more land zoned for conservation (31% vs 0%).
| Daylesford | Hepburn Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 13% | 59% |
| Rural and farming | 54% | 0% |
| Environmental | 0% | 31% |
| Parks and recreation | 28% | 4% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 4% same for both | |
| Commercial | 0% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Daylesford | Hepburn Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 104 across Hepburn same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -6% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Daylesford | Hepburn Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.2% $625/wk on $1.01M | 4.4% $650/wk on $775K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Daylesford | Hepburn Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 57% of VIC | Higher than 47% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 22% of VIC | Higher than 25% of VIC |
| Schools | Higher than 86% of VIC | Higher than 84% of VIC |
| Walkability | Higher than 89% of VIC | Higher than 82% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 16% of VIC | Higher than 28% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 83% of VIC | Higher than 87% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 76% of VIC same for both | |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 22% of VIC | Higher than 87% of VIC |
Liveability
Daylesford is more walkable (67 vs 29).
| Daylesford | Hepburn Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | — |
| Score | 49/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | advantaged area decile 8/10 |
Risk profile
Hepburn Springs carries more bushfire risk (90 vs 66).
| Daylesford | Hepburn Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 66/100 | High 90/100 |
| Crime | High 74/100 | High 72/100 |
| Flood | Low 37/100 same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Daylesford | Hepburn Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 4 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 2 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 same for both | |
Schools in Daylesford
- Daylesford Secondary College Government · Secondary above peers
- St Michael's School Catholic · Primary above peers
- Daylesford Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Daylesford Dharma School Independent · Primary below peers
Schools in Hepburn Springs
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Daylesford | Hepburn Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 17 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 11 | 0 |
| Childcare | 3 | 0 |
| GPs | 4 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Hospitals | 1 | 0 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 3 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 3 | 0 |
| EV chargers | 2 | 0 |
| Waterways | 31 | 0 |
Mobility
Hepburn Springs sits further from the CBD (116.1 km vs 112.6 km).
| Daylesford | Hepburn Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 67/100 | 29/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 112.6 km | 116.1 km +3% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 86 min | 95 min |
| Public transport score | 21/100 same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 1.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 1.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 33 min scheduled, not actual | 3.5 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.2% postcode 3460 | 1.4% postcode 3461 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 37 postcode 3460 | 48 postcode 3461 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (53.8%).
Setting
| Daylesford | Hepburn Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 641 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 490 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Daylesford | Hepburn Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 63/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 35% 2,342 premises | 33% 392 premises |
Climate
| Daylesford | Hepburn Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 531 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Daylesford | Hepburn Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,748/yr same for both | |
| Council | Hepburn same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Daylesford | Hepburn Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Ballarat same for both | |
| Member | Catherine King same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Daylesford | Hepburn Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Daylesford
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Daylesford
Other comparisons with Hepburn Springs
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.