Dakenba vs Mount Murchison
In both, most households own their home, most homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. On these figures, Dakenba tends to suit couples, while Mount Murchison suits people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Dakenba
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- is already more of a family suburb (85% vs 68%)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (90% vs 73%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Dakenba
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (15% vs 23%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Dakenba
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (7% vs 14%)
- has cheaper rent ($165/wk vs $300/wk)
- But Mount Murchison has a bigger rental market to choose from (33% vs 23%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Dakenba
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (406 min vs 411 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (578.6 km vs 581.5 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Mount Murchison
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (27% vs 10%)
- has more residents already 65 and over (22% vs 14%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Dakenba
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (9.5% vs -14.1%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Dakenba and Mount Murchison drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mount Murchison rents higher ($300/wk vs $165/wk).
| Dakenba | Mount Murchison | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 127 | 128 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +9.5% | -14.1% |
| Median age | 44 | 43 |
| Median household income | $117,000/yr +2% vs other | $114,816/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $165/wk | $300/wk +82% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (26.8%).
Development activity
| Dakenba | Mount Murchison | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 17 across Banana same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -93% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Dakenba | Mount Murchison | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 89% of QLD | Higher than 85% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 65% of QLD | Higher than 56% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 5% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 67% of QLD | Higher than 46% of QLD |
Liveability
| Dakenba | Mount Murchison | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Mount Murchison carries more bushfire risk (56 vs 0).
| Dakenba | Mount Murchison | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Moderate 56/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 47/100 | Low 39/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 3 within 5 km |
Schools
| Dakenba | Mount Murchison | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Dakenba
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Mount Murchison
- Mount Murchison State School Government · Primary
Amenities in the suburb
| Dakenba | Mount Murchison | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 3 same for both | |
Mobility
Mount Murchison sits further from the CBD (581.5 km vs 578.6 km).
| Dakenba | Mount Murchison | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 578.6 km | 581.5 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 406 min | 411 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.1% postcode 4715 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 47 postcode 4715 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (85.1%).
Setting
| Dakenba | Mount Murchison | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 167 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 278 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Dakenba | Mount Murchison | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 31/100 | 29/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 2% 52 premises | 0% 53 premises |
Climate
| Dakenba | Mount Murchison | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 606 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 33.4°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.6°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Dakenba | Mount Murchison | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,081/yr same for both | |
| Council | Banana same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Dakenba | Mount Murchison | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Flynn same for both | |
| Member | Colin Boyce same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Dakenba | Mount Murchison | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Dakenba
Other comparisons with Mount Murchison
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.