Cunningham vs Pratten
Cunningham is the younger of the two, with a median age of 49 against 54 in Pratten. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Cunningham, most households are couple families. In Pratten, about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Cunningham tends to suit couples and older residents, while Pratten suits people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Cunningham is already more of a family suburb (58% vs 50%)
- Pratten carries lower crime risk (38/100 vs 49/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Cunningham
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (25% vs 3%)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (6% vs 26%)
- has cheaper rent ($103/wk vs $210/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Cunningham
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (146 min vs 159 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (176.7 km vs 188.5 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Cunningham has more residents already 65 and over (34% vs 25%)
- Pratten carries lower crime risk (38/100 vs 49/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Pratten
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (11.7% vs -12.1%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Cunningham and Pratten drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Pratten has more residents (229 vs 58); Cunningham has higher household incomes ($97,448 vs $42,068).
| Cunningham | Pratten | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 58 | 229 +295% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -12.1% | +11.7% |
| Median age | 49 | 54 |
| Median household income | $97,448/yr +57% vs other | $42,068/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $103/wk | $210/wk +104% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (12.1%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (27.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Cunningham | Pratten | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $550,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $430,000 |
Development activity
| Cunningham | Pratten | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 291 across Southern Downs same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +63% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Cunningham | Pratten | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 70% of QLD | Higher than 5% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 38% of QLD same for both | |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 28% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 44% of QLD same for both | |
Liveability
| Cunningham | Pratten | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | high-need area decile 1/10 |
Risk profile
Cunningham carries more crime risk (49 vs 38).
| Cunningham | Pratten | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 49/100 | Low 38/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Cunningham | Pratten | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Cunningham | Pratten | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 1 same for both | |
Mobility
Pratten sits further from the CBD (188.5 km vs 176.7 km).
| Cunningham | Pratten | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 176.7 km | 188.5 km +7% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 146 min | 159 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.2% postcode 4370 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 57 postcode 4370 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.0%).
Setting
| Cunningham | Pratten | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 433 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 497 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Cunningham | Pratten | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 29/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 15 premises | 0% 97 premises |
Council rates
| Cunningham | Pratten | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,627/yr same for both | |
| Council | Southern Downs same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Cunningham | Pratten | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Maranoa same for both | |
| Member | David Littleproud same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Cunningham | Pratten | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Cunningham
Other comparisons with Pratten
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.