Croydon Park vs Ashbury
Croydon Park is the younger of the two, with a median age of 41 against 44 in Ashbury. In both, most households own their home. In Croydon Park, about half of households are couple families. In Ashbury, the large majority of homes are detached houses and most households are couple families. On these figures, Croydon Park tends to suit people living alone, while Ashbury suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Croydon Park has more parks and reserves (12 vs 3)
- Ashbury has more separate houses rather than flats (90% vs 48%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Croydon Park has cheaper units ($720,000 vs $2,139,000)
- Ashbury leaves households under less mortgage stress (25% vs 32%)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Croydon Park
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (33% vs 12%)
- has cheaper rent ($410/wk vs $600/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Croydon Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (81/100 vs 72/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Croydon Park
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (52% vs 10%)
- has more GPs (3 vs 0)
- is more walkable (81/100 vs 72/100)
- But Ashbury carries lower crime risk (29/100 vs 43/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Croydon Park and Ashbury drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Croydon Park has more residents (10,929 vs 3,353); Ashbury rents higher ($600/wk vs $410/wk).
| Croydon Park | Ashbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,929 +69% vs other | 3,353 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -0.8% | +0.7% |
| Median age | 41 | 44 |
| Median household income | $95,836/yr | $133,692/yr +40% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $410/wk | $600/wk +46% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.7%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Croydon Park | Ashbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2,251,000 | $2,412,500 |
| Median unit price | $720,000 | $2,139,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 28 days from 91 sales | 26 days from 19 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
40 vs 15 sales
33 vs 21 sales
Zoning mix
| Croydon Park | Ashbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 84% | 85% |
| Parks and recreation | 9% | 11% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 6% | 4% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Croydon Park | Ashbury | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,785 across Canterbury-Bankstown same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +50% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Croydon Park | Ashbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.3% $1,050/wk on $1.65M | — |
| Units | 4.8% $690/wk on $740K | — |
Ranking within NSW
| Croydon Park | Ashbury | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 88% of NSW same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 63% of NSW | Higher than 90% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 92% of NSW | Higher than 89% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 10% of NSW | Higher than 24% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 78% of NSW | Higher than 92% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 86% of NSW | Higher than 82% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 35% of NSW | — |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 59% of NSW | — |
Liveability
Croydon Park is more walkable (81 vs 72); Ashbury scores higher overall (84 vs 79).
| Croydon Park | Ashbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A same for both | |
| Score | 79/100 | 84/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Croydon Park carries more crime risk (43 vs 29).
| Croydon Park | Ashbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 43/100 | Low 29/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 5 within 5 km | 4 within 5 km |
Schools
| Croydon Park | Ashbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 2 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Strathfield Campus, 2.9 km | 3 Strathfield Campus, 4.2 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 3.2% | 3.8% |
Schools in Croydon Park
- St Francis Xavier Catholic School Ashbury Catholic · Primary above peers
- Croydon Park Public School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Ashbury
- Ashbury Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Canterbury Boys High School Government · Secondary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Croydon Park | Ashbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 4 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 12 | 3 |
| Childcare | 8 | 4 |
| GPs | 3 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 4 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 2 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 4 | 0 |
Mobility
| Croydon Park | Ashbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 81/100 | 72/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 12.7 km +2% vs other | 12.4 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 21 min | 20 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 236.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 76.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.9% postcode 2133 | 1.9% postcode 2193 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 18 postcode 2133 | 16 postcode 2193 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (64.8%).
Setting
| Croydon Park | Ashbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 13 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 34 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 8.1 km | 6.9 km |
NBN connectivity
| Croydon Park | Ashbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 77/100 | 75/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 11% 4,577 premises | 0% 1,204 premises |
Climate
| Croydon Park | Ashbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,129 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 27.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 9.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Croydon Park | Ashbury | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 16.1 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.79 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Croydon Park | Ashbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,322/yr same for both | |
| Council | Canterbury-Bankstown same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Croydon Park | Ashbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Grayndler same for both | |
| Member | Anthony Albanese same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Croydon Park | Ashbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Croydon Park
Ashbury
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Croydon Park
Other comparisons with Ashbury
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.