Croom vs Oak Flats
Croom is the younger of the two, with a median age of 38 against 42 in Oak Flats. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Croom, most households are couple families. On these figures, Croom tends to suit families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Oak Flats
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (14 vs 1)
- has more childcare (6 vs 0)
- has more schools inside the suburb (4 vs 0)
- But Croom has more separate houses rather than flats (109% vs 82%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Oak Flats
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (30% vs 36%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Croom
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (21% vs 30%)
- has cheaper rent ($365/wk vs $440/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Oak Flats
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (88/100 vs 4/100)
- has a shorter drive in (97 min vs 102 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Oak Flats
ahead on 4 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (88/100 vs 4/100)
- has more GPs (4 vs 0)
- has more residents already 65 and over (21% vs 15%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Oak Flats
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (6.6% vs -0.9%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Croom and Oak Flats drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Oak Flats has more residents (6,840 vs 112); Oak Flats rents higher ($440/wk vs $365/wk).
| Croom | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112 | 6,840 +6007% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -0.9% | +6.6% |
| Median age | 38 | 42 |
| Median household income | $89,336/yr +13% vs other | $77,376/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $365/wk | $440/wk +21% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.9%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Croom | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $988,500 |
| Median unit price | — | $700,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 24 days from 78 sales |
Zoning mix
Croom has more rural and farming land (69% vs 0%); Croom has more land zoned for conservation (20% vs 1%).
| Croom | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 69% | 0% |
| Residential | 0% | 64% |
| Environmental | 20% | 1% |
| Parks and recreation | 6% | 15% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 5% | 8% |
| Industrial | 0% | 7% |
| Commercial | 0% | 4% |
| Other and special use | 1% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Croom | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 883 across Shellharbour same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +25% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Croom | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 4.0% $725/wk on $940K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Croom | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — | Higher than 44% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 57% of NSW | Higher than 45% of NSW |
| Schools | — | Higher than 7% of NSW |
| Walkability | Higher than 45% of NSW | Higher than 95% of NSW |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 52% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 71% of NSW | Higher than 78% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 64% of NSW | Higher than 81% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 74% of NSW |
Liveability
Oak Flats is more walkable (88 vs 4).
| Croom | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | C |
| Score | — | 45/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
Croom carries more bushfire risk (16 vs 0); Croom carries more crime risk (87 vs 74).
| Croom | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 16/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | High 87/100 | High 74/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 7 within 5 km | 6 within 5 km |
Schools
| Croom | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 4 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 3 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
Schools in Croom
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Oak Flats
- Balarang Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Corpus Christi Catholic High School Catholic · Secondary at peers
- Oak Flats Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Oak Flats High School Government · Secondary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Croom | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 14 |
| Childcare | 0 | 6 |
| GPs | 0 | 4 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 2 |
| Hospitals | 0 | 1 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 2 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 2 | 1 |
Mobility
| Croom | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 4/100 | 88/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 111.6 km +2% vs other | 109.9 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 102 min | 97 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.7% postcode 2527 | 0.9% postcode 2529 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 60 postcode 2527 | 45 postcode 2529 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (71.8%).
Setting
| Croom | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 118 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 17 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 4.9 km | 4.3 km 4.3 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Croom | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 42/100 | 74/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 17% 54 premises | 53% 3,270 premises |
Climate
| Croom | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 974 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Croom | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.1 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.37 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Croom | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,788/yr same for both | |
| Council | Shellharbour same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Croom | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Whitlam same for both | |
| Member | Carol Berry same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Croom | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Oak Flats
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Croom
Other comparisons with Oak Flats
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.