Cromer vs Mount Pleasant
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Cromer, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Cromer tends to suit couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Cromer is already more of a family suburb (61% vs 52%)
- Mount Pleasant has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Mount Pleasant
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($250/wk vs $335/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Cromer
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (52.5 km vs 67.3 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Too close to call
Nothing among the 5 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Cromer
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (15.0% vs 3.7%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Cromer and Mount Pleasant drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mount Pleasant has more residents (1,058 vs 215); Cromer rents higher ($335/wk vs $250/wk).
| Cromer | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 215 | 1,058 +392% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +15.0% | +3.7% |
| Median age | 49 | 48 |
| Median household income | $84,500/yr +19% vs other | $68,692/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $335/wk +25% vs other | $250/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.4%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Cromer | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $665,500 |
| Median unit price | — | $405,000 |
| Median land price | — | $1,125,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 30 days from 10 sales |
Zoning mix
| Cromer | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 97% | 98% |
| Environmental | 3% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Cromer | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 180 across Barossa same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -48% same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Cromer | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 61% of SA | Higher than 38% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 31% of SA same for both | |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 43% of SA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 60% of SA same for both | |
Liveability
| Cromer | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | C |
| Score | — | 44/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
Mount Pleasant carries more bushfire risk (35 vs 0).
| Cromer | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 35/100 |
| Crime | Low 16/100 | Low 23/100 |
| Flood | — | Low 17/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Cromer | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Cromer
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Mount Pleasant
- Mount Pleasant Primary School Government · Primary above peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Cromer | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 3 same for both | |
| Childcare | 0 | 2 |
| GPs | 0 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 6 | 9 |
Mobility
Mount Pleasant sits further from the CBD (67.3 km vs 52.5 km).
| Cromer | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Adelaide | 52.5 km | 67.3 km +28% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 65 min | 69 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 5235 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 78 postcode 5235 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (72.6%).
Setting
| Cromer | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 444 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 434 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 38.5 km | 47.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Cromer | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 84 premises | 0% 482 premises |
Climate
| Cromer | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 921 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Cromer | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,247/yr same for both | |
| Council | Barossa same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Cromer | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Barker same for both | |
| Member | Tony Pasin same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Cromer | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Cromer
Other comparisons with Mount Pleasant
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.