Cromer vs Mount Crawford
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Cromer, about half of households are couple families. In Mount Crawford, the large majority of households are couple families. On these figures, Cromer tends to suit people living alone, while Mount Crawford suits families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Mount Crawford
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is already more of a family suburb (81% vs 61%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Cromer
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a shorter drive in (65 min vs 72 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Too close to call
Nothing among the 4 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Cromer
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (15.0% vs 8.7%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Cromer and Mount Crawford drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Cromer has more residents (215 vs 138).
| Cromer | Mount Crawford | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 215 +36% vs other | 138 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +15.0% | +8.7% |
| Median age | 49 | 48 |
| Median household income | $84,500/yr | $89,648/yr +6% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $335/wk | $360/wk +7% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.4%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.5%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Zoning mix
| Cromer | Mount Crawford | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 97% | 96% |
| Environmental | 3% | 4% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Cromer | Mount Crawford | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 180 across Barossa same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -48% same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Cromer | Mount Crawford | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 61% of SA | Higher than 68% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 31% of SA | Higher than 12% of SA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 43% of SA | Higher than 53% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 60% of SA | Higher than 35% of SA |
Liveability
| Cromer | Mount Crawford | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Mount Crawford carries more bushfire risk (24 vs 0).
| Cromer | Mount Crawford | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 24/100 |
| Crime | Low 16/100 | Low 24/100 |
| Flood | — same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Cromer | Mount Crawford | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Cromer | Mount Crawford | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 2 |
| Waterways | 6 | 2 |
Mobility
| Cromer | Mount Crawford | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Adelaide | 52.5 km | 53.4 km +2% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 65 min | 72 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 5235 | 0.5% postcode 5351 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 78 postcode 5235 | 85 postcode 5351 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (82.7%).
Setting
| Cromer | Mount Crawford | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 444 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 438 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 38.5 km | 39.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Cromer | Mount Crawford | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 25/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 84 premises | 0% 36 premises |
Climate
| Cromer | Mount Crawford | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 921 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Cromer | Mount Crawford | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 18.7 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.31 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Cromer | Mount Crawford | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,247/yr same for both | |
| Council | Barossa same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Cromer | Mount Crawford | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Barker same for both | |
| Member | Tony Pasin same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Cromer | Mount Crawford | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Cromer
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.