Crescent vs Renmark
Renmark is the younger of the two, with a median age of 44 against 47 in Crescent. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Crescent, about half of households are couple families. In Renmark, about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Crescent tends to suit couples, while Renmark suits people living alone and older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Crescent carries lower crime risk (11/100 vs 79/100)
- Renmark has more childcare (5 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Renmark
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (22% vs 28%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Renmark
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (39% vs 5%)
- has cheaper rent ($200/wk vs $246/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Renmark
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (67/100 vs 4/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Renmark
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (67/100 vs 4/100)
- has more GPs (2 vs 0)
- has more residents already 65 and over (27% vs 18%)
- But Crescent carries lower crime risk (11/100 vs 79/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Crescent
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (10.5% vs 1.5%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Crescent and Renmark drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Renmark has more residents (4,705 vs 221); Crescent rents higher ($246/wk vs $200/wk).
| Crescent | Renmark | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 221 | 4,705 +2029% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +10.5% | +1.5% |
| Median age | 47 | 44 |
| Median household income | $59,280/yr +11% vs other | $52,884/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $246/wk +19% vs other | $200/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.7%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Crescent | Renmark | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $440,500 |
| Median unit price | — | $402,500 |
| Median land price | — | $184,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 52 days from 57 sales |
Zoning mix
Crescent has more rural and farming land (24% vs 0%); Crescent has more land zoned for conservation (71% vs 53%).
| Crescent | Renmark | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 71% | 53% |
| Residential | 0% | 30% |
| Rural and farming | 24% | 0% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 0% | 7% |
| Other and special use | 5% | 2% |
| Commercial | 0% | 4% |
| Industrial | 0% | 3% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Crescent | Renmark | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 61 across Renmark Paringa same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +0% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Crescent | Renmark | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 4.7% $470/wk on $525K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Crescent | Renmark | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 27% of SA | Higher than 17% of SA |
| Schools | — | Higher than 55% of SA |
| Walkability | Higher than 59% of SA | Higher than 87% of SA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 14% of SA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 54% of SA | Higher than 77% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 92% of SA |
Liveability
Renmark is more walkable (67 vs 4).
| Crescent | Renmark | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | C |
| Score | — | 40/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | high-need area decile 1/10 |
Risk profile
Renmark carries more crime risk (79 vs 11).
| Crescent | Renmark | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 11/100 | High 79/100 |
| Flood | — same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 4 within 5 km | 3 within 5 km |
Schools
| Crescent | Renmark | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 4 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 2 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
Schools in Crescent
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Renmark
- St Francis of Assisi College Catholic · Secondary above peers
- Renmark Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- St Joseph's School Catholic · Primary at peers
- Renmark High School Government · Secondary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Crescent | Renmark | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 4 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 10 |
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 4 |
| Childcare | 0 | 5 |
| GPs | 0 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 2 |
| Hospitals | 0 | 1 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 4 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 5 |
| Waterways | 6 | 1 |
Mobility
| Crescent | Renmark | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 4/100 | 67/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 258.6 km | 259.2 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 175 min | 174 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.1% postcode 5341 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 67 postcode 5341 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (90.2%).
Setting
| Crescent | Renmark | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 19 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 23 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Crescent | Renmark | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Fibre to the node |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 102 premises | 27% 2,691 premises |
Climate
| Crescent | Renmark | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 256 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 32.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 4.5°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Crescent | Renmark | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,591/yr same for both | |
| Council | Renmark Paringa same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Crescent | Renmark | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Barker same for both | |
| Member | Tony Pasin same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Crescent | Renmark | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Crescent
Renmark
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Crescent
Other comparisons with Renmark
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.