Cranley vs Mount Kynoch
Mount Kynoch is the younger of the two, with a median age of 29 against 60 in Cranley. In both, most homes are detached houses. In Cranley, most households own their home and about half of households are people living alone. In Mount Kynoch, about half of households rent and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Cranley: a median of $838,000, against $730,000 in Mount Kynoch, though rent is higher in Mount Kynoch. On these figures, Cranley tends to suit people living alone and older residents, while Mount Kynoch suits renters, young adults, and families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Mount Kynoch
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- is already more of a family suburb (68% vs 38%)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (89% vs 68%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Mount Kynoch
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (19% vs 32%)
- has cheaper land ($556,000 vs $650,000)
- has cheaper houses ($730,000 vs $837,500)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Mount Kynoch
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (49% vs 27%)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (17% vs 30%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Cranley
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (98 min vs 105 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (129.5 km vs 133.4 km)
- But Mount Kynoch is more walkable (21/100 vs 6/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Cranley
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more residents already 65 and over (45% vs 8%)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (32% vs 16%)
- But Mount Kynoch is more walkable (21/100 vs 6/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Cranley
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (57.7% vs 14.3%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Cranley and Mount Kynoch drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Cranley has more residents (2,281 vs 271); Cranley skews older (60 vs 29).
| Cranley | Mount Kynoch | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,281 +88% vs other | 271 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +57.7% | +14.3% |
| Median age | 60 | 29 |
| Median household income | $57,824/yr | $108,732/yr +88% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $330/wk | $350/wk +6% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.5%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Cranley | Mount Kynoch | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $837,500 | $730,000 |
| Median unit price | $650,000 | — |
| Median land price | $650,000 | $556,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 34 days from 8 sales | — |
Development activity
| Cranley | Mount Kynoch | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,513 across Toowoomba same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -25% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Cranley | Mount Kynoch | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.1% $620/wk on $795K | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Cranley | Mount Kynoch | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 20% of QLD | Higher than 81% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 69% of QLD | Higher than 79% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 71% of QLD | Higher than 70% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 93% of QLD | Higher than 96% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 58% of QLD | — |
Liveability
Mount Kynoch is more walkable (21 vs 6).
| Cranley | Mount Kynoch | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | — |
| Score | 46/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | advantaged area decile 8/10 |
Risk profile
| Cranley | Mount Kynoch | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 60/100 | Moderate 66/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 7 within 5 km | 5 within 5 km |
Schools
| Cranley | Mount Kynoch | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 USQ (Toowoomba), 5.7 km | 1 USQ (Toowoomba), 5.5 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 1.1% | 2.6% |
Amenities in the suburb
| Cranley | Mount Kynoch | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 same for both | |
| Childcare | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 2 | 0 |
Mobility
Mount Kynoch sits further from the CBD (133.4 km vs 129.5 km).
| Cranley | Mount Kynoch | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 6/100 | 21/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 129.5 km | 133.4 km +3% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 98 min | 105 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 4350 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 41 postcode 4350 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (90.6%).
Setting
| Cranley | Mount Kynoch | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 590 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 622 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Cranley | Mount Kynoch | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 83/100 | 92/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 72% 604 premises | 89% 88 premises |
Climate
| Cranley | Mount Kynoch | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 577 mm | 643 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | 31.0°C | — |
| Winter min (Jul) | 3.9°C | — |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Cranley | Mount Kynoch | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 4.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 12.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Cranley | Mount Kynoch | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,618/yr same for both | |
| Council | Toowoomba same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Cranley | Mount Kynoch | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Groom same for both | |
| Member | Garth Hamilton same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Cranley | Mount Kynoch | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Cranley
Mount Kynoch
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Cranley
Other comparisons with Mount Kynoch
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.