Cottesloe vs Mosman Park
In both, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Cottesloe, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Cottesloe: a median of $3.05 million, against $2.27 million in Mosman Park, and rent is higher there too. Cottesloe is closer to the city centre: 12.1 km, against 14.9 km. On these figures, Mosman Park tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Mosman Park
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools inside the suburb (7 vs 1)
- has more parks and reserves (23 vs 6)
- has more childcare (6 vs 2)
- But Cottesloe carries lower crime risk (48/100 vs 70/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Mosman Park
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper units ($500,000 vs $1,022,500)
- has cheaper houses ($2,270,000 vs $3,050,000)
- But Cottesloe leaves households under less mortgage stress (27% vs 32%)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Mosman Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($300/wk vs $550/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Cottesloe
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (12.1 km vs 14.9 km)
- is more walkable (92/100 vs 82/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Cottesloe
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (48/100 vs 70/100)
- is more walkable (92/100 vs 82/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Cottesloe returns a higher gross yield on houses (2.2% vs 1.7%)
- Mosman Park returns a higher gross yield on units (5.4% vs 2.1%)
Weighs house yield, unit yield, and population growth.
Where they sit
Cottesloe and Mosman Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Cottesloe rents higher ($550/wk vs $300/wk); Cottesloe has higher household incomes ($174,252 vs $110,864).
| Cottesloe | Mosman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,750 | 9,169 +18% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +5.1% | +4.7% |
| Median age | 44 | 42 |
| Median household income | $174,252/yr +36% vs other | $110,864/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $550/wk +45% vs other | $300/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (31.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (8.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Cottesloe | Mosman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $3,050,000 | $2,270,000 |
| Median unit price | $1,022,500 | $500,000 |
| Median land price | — | $1,687,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 46 days from 90 sales | 35 days from 92 sales |
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
11 vs 45 sales
26 vs 47 sales
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
8 vs 12 sales
40 vs 36 sales
43 vs 45 sales
9 vs 18 sales
Development activity
| Cottesloe | Mosman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 19 across Cottesloe | 17 across Mosman Park |
| Approvals change year on year | +0% | -90% |
Gross rental yield
| Cottesloe | Mosman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 2.2% $1,062/wk on $2.55M | 1.7% $1,000/wk on $3M |
| Units | 2.1% $762/wk on $1.87M | 5.4% $570/wk on $545K |
Ranking within WA
| Cottesloe | Mosman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 98% of WA | Higher than 77% of WA |
| Schools | — | Higher than 19% of WA |
| Walkability | Higher than 99% of WA | Higher than 96% of WA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 100% of WA | Higher than 98% of WA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 89% of WA same for both | |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 1% of WA same for both | |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 1% of WA | Higher than 50% of WA |
Liveability
Cottesloe scores higher overall (95 vs 63); Cottesloe is more walkable (92 vs 82).
| Cottesloe | Mosman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A+ | B |
| Score | 95/100 | 63/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Mosman Park carries more flood risk (28 vs 0); Mosman Park carries more crime risk (70 vs 48).
| Cottesloe | Mosman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 48/100 | High 70/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 | Low 28/100 |
| Coastal erosion | Moderate 53/100 | None 0/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 4 within 5 km | 7 within 5 km |
Schools
| Cottesloe | Mosman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 7 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 2 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 2 |
| Universities within 10 km | 2 The University of Notre Dame Australia - Fremantle, 6.6 km | 3 The University of Notre Dame Australia - Fremantle, 4.3 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 4.4% | 4.3% |
Schools in Cottesloe
- North Cottesloe Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Mosman Park
- Mosman Park Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- The Beehive Montessori School Independent · Combined at peers
- Iona Presentation College Catholic · Secondary below peers
- St Hilda's Anglican School for Girls Independent · Secondary below peers
- Iona Presentation College - Primary Campus Catholic · Primary
- St Hilda's Anglican School for Girls - Chidley Campus Independent · Primary
Amenities in the suburb
| Cottesloe | Mosman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 same for both | |
| Cafes & restaurants | 15 | 8 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 23 |
| Childcare | 2 | 6 |
| GPs | 2 same for both | |
| Pharmacies | 2 | 3 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 2 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 2 |
| EV chargers | 1 | 0 |
| Beaches | 2 | 3 |
| Waterways | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
Mosman Park sits further from the CBD (14.9 km vs 12.1 km).
| Cottesloe | Mosman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 92/100 | 82/100 |
| Distance to Perth | 12.1 km | 14.9 km +23% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 21 min | 24 min |
| Public transport score | 80/100 Rail · Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 120.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 138.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 3.3% postcode 6011 | 2.7% postcode 6012 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 34 postcode 6011 | 34 postcode 6012 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (64.2%).
Setting
| Cottesloe | Mosman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 33 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 22 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 645 m 672 m to a named beach | 1.3 km 978 m to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Cottesloe | Mosman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 76/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 4% 4,077 premises | 7% 4,469 premises |
Climate
| Cottesloe | Mosman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 716 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.8°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 10.4°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Cottesloe | Mosman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $3,718/yr | $2,802/yr |
| Council | Cottesloe | Mosman Park |
Federal electorate
| Cottesloe | Mosman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Curtin same for both | |
| Member | Kate Chaney same for both | |
| Party | Independent same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Cottesloe | Mosman Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $800,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Cottesloe
Mosman Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Cottesloe
Other comparisons with Mosman Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.