Cosgrove vs Katandra
Katandra is the younger of the two, with a median age of 48 against 55 in Cosgrove. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Cosgrove, most households are people living alone. In Katandra, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Cosgrove tends to suit people living alone, while Katandra suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Cosgrove carries lower crime risk (28/100 vs 56/100)
- Katandra is already more of a family suburb (70% vs 40%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Katandra
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($170/wk vs $200/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Cosgrove
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (148 min vs 155 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (212.6 km vs 219.5 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Cosgrove carries lower crime risk (28/100 vs 56/100)
- Katandra has more residents already 65 and over (17% vs 8%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Katandra
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (6.2% vs -7.4%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Cosgrove and Katandra drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Katandra has more residents (120 vs 50); Cosgrove rents higher ($200/wk vs $170/wk).
| Cosgrove | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 50 | 120 +140% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -7.4% | +6.2% |
| Median age | 55 | 48 |
| Median household income | $58,500/yr same for both | |
| Median weekly rent | $200/wk +15% vs other | $170/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (30.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.0%).
Zoning mix
| Cosgrove | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 99% | 100% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 1% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Cosgrove | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 649 across Greater Shepparton same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -23% same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Cosgrove | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 17% of VIC | Higher than 18% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 15% of VIC | Higher than 34% of VIC |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 41% of VIC | Higher than 18% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 53% of VIC | Higher than 59% of VIC |
Liveability
| Cosgrove | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
Katandra carries more crime risk (56 vs 28); Cosgrove carries more flood risk (88 vs 71).
| Cosgrove | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 40/100 | Low 33/100 |
| Crime | Low 28/100 | Moderate 56/100 |
| Flood | High 88/100 | High 71/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 4 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Cosgrove | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Cosgrove | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 0 |
| Waterways | 0 | 2 |
Mobility
Katandra sits further from the CBD (219.5 km vs 212.6 km).
| Cosgrove | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Melbourne | 212.6 km | 219.5 km +3% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 148 min | 155 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 3631 | 0.3% postcode 3634 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 70 postcode 3631 | 64 postcode 3634 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (73.2%).
Setting
| Cosgrove | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 125 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 126 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Cosgrove | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 30 premises | 0% 58 premises |
Climate
| Cosgrove | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 484 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Cosgrove | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,449/yr same for both | |
| Council | Greater Shepparton same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Cosgrove | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Nicholls same for both | |
| Member | Sam Birrell same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Cosgrove | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Cosgrove
Other comparisons with Katandra
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.