Coromandel Valley vs Chandlers Hill
Coromandel Valley is the younger of the two, with a median age of 41 against 46 in Chandlers Hill. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Coromandel Valley is closer to the city centre: 16.8 km, against 24.4 km. On these figures, Chandlers Hill tends to suit couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Coromandel Valley has more childcare (3 vs 0)
- Chandlers Hill is already more of a family suburb (85% vs 76%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Coromandel Valley
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper land ($865,000 vs $1,057,500)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Chandlers Hill
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($370/wk vs $420/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Coromandel Valley
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (51/100 vs 12/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (16.8 km vs 24.4 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Coromandel Valley
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (51/100 vs 12/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Coromandel Valley and Chandlers Hill drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Coromandel Valley has more residents (4,380 vs 792); Chandlers Hill has higher household incomes ($138,008 vs $116,532).
| Coromandel Valley | Chandlers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,380 +82% vs other | 792 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +4.3% | +9.1% |
| Median age | 41 | 46 |
| Median household income | $116,532/yr | $138,008/yr +18% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $420/wk +12% vs other | $370/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.3%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (9.5%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Coromandel Valley | Chandlers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,150,000 | $1,105,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $865,000 | $1,057,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 20 days from 34 sales | 30 days from 3 sales |
Zoning mix
Chandlers Hill has more rural and farming land (49% vs 0%); Chandlers Hill has more land zoned for conservation (49% vs 19%).
| Coromandel Valley | Chandlers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 77% | 2% |
| Rural and farming | 0% | 49% |
| Environmental | 19% | 49% |
| Parks and recreation | 3% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Coromandel Valley | Chandlers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,367 across Onkaparinga same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +58% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Coromandel Valley | Chandlers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.4% $800/wk on $1.21M | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Coromandel Valley | Chandlers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 60% of SA | Higher than 50% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 89% of SA | Higher than 96% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 81% of SA | Higher than 66% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 80% of SA | Higher than 94% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 94% of SA | Higher than 77% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 81% of SA | Higher than 76% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 29% of SA | — |
Liveability
Coromandel Valley is more walkable (51 vs 12).
| Coromandel Valley | Chandlers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A same for both | |
| Score | 72/100 same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Coromandel Valley carries more bushfire risk (17 vs 0).
| Coromandel Valley | Chandlers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 17/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Low 13/100 | Low 22/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 48/100 | — |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Coromandel Valley | Chandlers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 2 Bedford Park, 5.5 km | 1 Bedford Park, 8.2 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.9% | 1.8% |
Schools in Coromandel Valley
- Coromandel Valley Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Chandlers Hill
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Coromandel Valley | Chandlers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 0 |
| Childcare | 3 | 0 |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 5 | 0 |
Mobility
Chandlers Hill sits further from the CBD (24.4 km vs 16.8 km).
| Coromandel Valley | Chandlers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 51/100 | 12/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 16.8 km | 24.4 km +45% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 28 min | 32 min |
| Public transport score | 74/100 Bus | 26/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 46.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 2.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 20 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.9% postcode 5051 | 1.0% postcode 5159 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 73 postcode 5051 | 70 postcode 5159 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (77.8%).
Setting
| Coromandel Valley | Chandlers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 193 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 342 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 9.8 km | 10.7 km |
NBN connectivity
| Coromandel Valley | Chandlers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 69/100 | 56/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 44% 1,636 premises | 33% 267 premises |
Climate
| Coromandel Valley | Chandlers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 969 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 23.8°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 5.4°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Coromandel Valley | Chandlers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.0 µg/m³ | — |
| PM10 | 17.8 µg/m³ | 19.5 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | 1.12 pphm | 0.34 pphm |
Council rates
| Coromandel Valley | Chandlers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,008/yr same for both | |
| Council | Onkaparinga same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Coromandel Valley | Chandlers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Mayo same for both | |
| Member | Rebekha Sharkie same for both | |
| Party | Centre Alliance same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Coromandel Valley | Chandlers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Coromandel Valley
Chandlers Hill
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Coromandel Valley
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.