Copmanhurst vs Whiteman Creek
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Whiteman Creek, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Whiteman Creek: a median of $820,000, against $405,000 in Copmanhurst, though rent is higher in Copmanhurst. On these figures, Copmanhurst tends to suit people living alone, families with children, and buyers on a tighter budget, while Whiteman Creek suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Copmanhurst has more parks and reserves (4 vs 0)
- Whiteman Creek is already more of a family suburb (63% vs 43%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Copmanhurst
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($405,000 vs $820,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Whiteman Creek
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (15% vs 29%)
- has cheaper rent ($243/wk vs $285/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Whiteman Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (633.2 km vs 635.7 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Copmanhurst
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more residents already 65 and over (25% vs 20%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Copmanhurst
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (13.2% vs -4.8%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Copmanhurst and Whiteman Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Copmanhurst has more residents (344 vs 158); Whiteman Creek has higher household incomes ($84,500 vs $50,648).
| Copmanhurst | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 344 +54% vs other | 158 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +13.2% | -4.8% |
| Median age | 50 | 51 |
| Median household income | $50,648/yr | $84,500/yr +67% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $285/wk +15% vs other | $243/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Copmanhurst | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $405,000 | $820,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $92,000 | — |
Zoning mix
| Copmanhurst | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 94% | 96% |
| Environmental | 3% | 4% |
| Residential | 3% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Copmanhurst | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 246 across Clarence Valley same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -80% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Copmanhurst | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 15% of NSW | Higher than 35% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 12% of NSW | — |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 57% of NSW | Higher than 48% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 66% of NSW | — |
| EV adoption | Higher than 18% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 46% of NSW | Higher than 38% of NSW |
Liveability
| Copmanhurst | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | high-need area decile 1/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
| Copmanhurst | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 62/100 | Moderate 69/100 |
| Crime | High 70/100 | Moderate 66/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Copmanhurst | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
Schools in Copmanhurst
- Copmanhurst Public School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Whiteman Creek
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Copmanhurst | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 0 |
| Childcare | 1 | 0 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 8 | 1 |
Mobility
Copmanhurst sits further from the CBD (635.7 km vs 633.2 km).
| Copmanhurst | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 10/100 | 5/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 635.7 km | 633.2 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 427 min | 425 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.2% postcode 2460 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 60 postcode 2460 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (76.3%).
Setting
| Copmanhurst | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 35 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 72 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 49.9 km | 44.3 km |
NBN connectivity
| Copmanhurst | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 29/100 | 26/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 161 premises | 0% 53 premises |
Climate
| Copmanhurst | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,060 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.0°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.3°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Copmanhurst | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,380/yr same for both | |
| Council | Clarence Valley same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Copmanhurst | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Page same for both | |
| Member | Kevin Hogan same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Copmanhurst | Whiteman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Copmanhurst
Other comparisons with Whiteman Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.