Coomera vs Pimpama
In both, most homes are detached houses and about half of households are couple families. In Coomera, about half of households rent. In Pimpama, most households rent.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Pimpama
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
- has more childcare (20 vs 16)
- But Coomera has more parks and reserves (30 vs 18)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 4 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices, unit prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Coomera is more walkable (57/100 vs 17/100)
- Pimpama sits closer to the CBD (52.9 km vs 57.8 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Coomera
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (57/100 vs 17/100)
- has more GPs (8 vs 5)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Coomera returns a higher gross yield on units (4.9% vs 4.3%)
- Pimpama is growing faster (161.8% vs 52.0%)
Weighs house yield, unit yield, and population growth.
Where they sit
Coomera and Pimpama drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
| Coomera | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,225 | 24,601 +22% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +52.0% | +161.8% |
| Median age | 29 same for both | |
| Median household income | $100,360/yr +3% vs other | $96,876/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $450/wk +2% vs other | $440/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.8%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (10.9%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Coomera | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $960,000 same for both | |
| Median unit price | $720,000 | $737,000 |
| Median land price | $906,000 | $973,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 21 days from 237 sales | 23 days from 430 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
8 vs 12 sales
80 vs 122 sales
271 vs 432 sales
17 vs 26 sales
Development activity
| Coomera | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 7,196 across Gold Coast same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -35% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Coomera | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.2% $800/wk on $999K | 4.1% $750/wk on $950K |
| Units | 4.9% $762/wk on $815K | 4.3% $695/wk on $850K |
Ranking within QLD
| Coomera | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 74% of QLD | Higher than 70% of QLD |
| Schools | Higher than 34% of QLD | Higher than 48% of QLD |
| Walkability | Higher than 88% of QLD | Higher than 77% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 88% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 93% of QLD | Higher than 96% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 63% of QLD | Higher than 61% of QLD |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 70% of QLD | Higher than 42% of QLD |
Liveability
Coomera is more walkable (57 vs 17).
| Coomera | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | B |
| Score | 49/100 | 50/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
| Coomera | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 71/100 | Moderate 67/100 |
| Flood | — same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | Moderate 55/100 | None 0/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Coomera | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 6 | 7 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 3 | 4 |
| Rated below peers | 2 | 1 |
Schools in Coomera
- Coomera Rivers State School Government · Primary at peers
- Coomera State School Government · Primary at peers
- Picnic Creek State School Government · Primary at peers
- Foxwell State Secondary College Government · Secondary below peers
- St Joseph's College Catholic · Combined below peers
- Coomera State Special School Government · Combined · Special school
Schools in Pimpama
- Pimpama State School Government · Primary above peers
- Lutheran Ormeau Rivers District School Independent · Combined at peers
- Ormeau State School Government · Primary at peers
- Pimpama State Primary College Government · Primary at peers
- Pimpama State Secondary College Government · Secondary at peers
- Gainsborough State School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Coomera | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 5 same for both | |
| Cafes & restaurants | 19 | 11 |
| Parks & reserves | 30 | 18 |
| Childcare | 16 | 20 |
| GPs | 8 | 5 |
| Pharmacies | 5 | 2 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 3 | 2 |
| Fuel stations | 5 | 6 |
| EV chargers | 1 same for both | |
| Beaches | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 17 | 7 |
Mobility
Coomera sits further from the CBD (57.8 km vs 52.9 km).
| Coomera | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 57/100 | 17/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 57.8 km +8% vs other | 52.9 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 48 min | 47 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Rail · Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 156.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 181.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.3% postcode 4209 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 61 postcode 4209 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (79.7%).
Setting
| Coomera | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 14 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 4 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 4.6 km 2.5 km to a named beach | 6.2 km |
NBN connectivity
| Coomera | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 84/100 | 93/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 66% 6,533 premises | 87% 8,619 premises |
Climate
| Coomera | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,351 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.9°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 12.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Coomera | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.42 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Coomera | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,298/yr same for both | |
| Council | Gold Coast same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Coomera | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Fadden same for both | |
| Member | Cameron Caldwell same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Coomera | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Coomera
Pimpama
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Coomera
Other comparisons with Pimpama
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.