Coombs vs Denman Prospect
In both, most households own their home. In Coombs, about half of households are couple families. In Denman Prospect, most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Denman Prospect: a median of $1.25 million, against $1.05 million in Coombs. On these figures, Coombs tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget.
Coombs and Denman Prospect are both affluent ACT suburbs with similar median unit prices around $570,000, though houses in Denman Prospect command a notably higher median price of $1,260,000 compared to Coombs at $1,050,000. Coombs offers better walkability (72 versus 48) and lower crime risk (51 versus 77), making it more suited to those prioritising pedestrian-friendly living and safety. Denman Prospect has a higher median household income of $167,388 and slightly better rental yields for houses at 5.7 percent, while Coombs is marginally closer to the CBD at 14.3 kilometres.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Coombs carries lower crime risk (51/100 vs 77/100)
- Denman Prospect has more separate houses rather than flats (49% vs 37%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Coombs
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($1,050,000 vs $1,245,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Coombs
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (28% vs 15%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Coombs
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (72/100 vs 48/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Coombs
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (51/100 vs 77/100)
- is more walkable (72/100 vs 48/100)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (63% vs 51%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Coombs returns a higher gross yield on units (6.3% vs 5.6%)
- Denman Prospect returns a higher gross yield on houses (5.9% vs 5.3%)
Weighs house yield and unit yield.
Where they sit
Coombs and Denman Prospect drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Coombs has more residents (4,851 vs 2,759); Denman Prospect has higher household incomes ($167,388 vs $136,968).
| Coombs | Denman Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,851 +43% vs other | 2,759 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +167.9% | — |
| Median age | 30 | 31 |
| Median household income | $136,968/yr | $167,388/yr +22% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $480/wk | $498/wk +4% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (26.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.7%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (12.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Coombs | Denman Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,050,000 | $1,245,000 |
| Median unit price | $572,500 | $570,000 |
| Median land price | — | $810,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 27 days from 25 sales | 60 days from 48 sales |
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
13 vs 56 sales
53 vs 86 sales
28 vs 16 sales
9 vs 5 sales
Development activity
| Coombs | Denman Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 3,750 across Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -48% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Coombs | Denman Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 5.3% $720/wk on $710K | 5.9% $950/wk on $840K |
| Units | 6.3% $600/wk on $499K | 5.6% $595/wk on $549K |
Ranking within ACT
| Coombs | Denman Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 71% of ACT | Higher than 92% of ACT |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 69% of ACT | Higher than 32% of ACT |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 73% of ACT | Higher than 74% of ACT |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 93% of ACT | Higher than 96% of ACT |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 91% of ACT | Higher than 100% of ACT |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 63% of ACT | Higher than 32% of ACT |
Liveability
Coombs is more walkable (72 vs 48).
| Coombs | Denman Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C same for both | |
| Score | 43/100 | 41/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Denman Prospect carries more crime risk (77 vs 51); Coombs carries more flood risk (64 vs 46).
| Coombs | Denman Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 99/100 | High 98/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 51/100 | High 77/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 64/100 | Moderate 46/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Coombs | Denman Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Australian National University, 7.9 km | 2 Australian National University, 8.1 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.5% | 1.7% |
Schools in Coombs
- Charles Weston School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Denman Prospect
- Evelyn Scott School Government · Combined
Amenities in the suburb
| Coombs | Denman Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 same for both | |
| Parks & reserves | 1 same for both | |
| Childcare | 3 same for both | |
| GPs | 1 same for both | |
| Pharmacies | 1 same for both | |
| Waterways | 7 | 5 |
Mobility
| Coombs | Denman Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 72/100 | 48/100 |
| Distance to Canberra | 14.3 km | 15.1 km +6% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 19 min | 22 min |
| Public transport score | 77/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 43.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 64.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 4.0% postcode 2611 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 52 postcode 2611 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.2%).
Setting
| Coombs | Denman Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 561 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 556 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Coombs | Denman Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 100/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 100% 2,384 premises | 100% 2,335 premises |
Climate
| Coombs | Denman Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 686 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.2°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 0.9°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Coombs | Denman Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.4 µg/m³ | 6.6 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | 14.1 µg/m³ | 11.0 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | — | 0.41 pphm |
Council rates
| Coombs | Denman Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $3,105/yr same for both | |
| Council | Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Coombs | Denman Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Bean same for both | |
| Member | David Smith same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Coombs | Denman Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | Not offered same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | None same for both | |
Tags
Denman Prospect
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Coombs
Other comparisons with Denman Prospect
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.