Coolaroo vs Roxburgh Park
Roxburgh Park is the younger of the two, with a median age of 31 against 37 in Coolaroo. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Roxburgh Park, most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Roxburgh Park: a median of $705,000, against $625,000 in Coolaroo, and rent is higher there too. Coolaroo is closer to the city centre: 21 km, against 23.6 km. On these figures, Roxburgh Park tends to suit couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Roxburgh Park
ahead on 5 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (40 vs 6)
- has more schools inside the suburb (5 vs 2)
- has more childcare (12 vs 6)
- But Coolaroo has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Coolaroo has cheaper houses ($625,000 vs $705,000)
- Roxburgh Park leaves households under less mortgage stress (25% vs 30%)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Coolaroo has cheaper rent ($335/wk vs $390/wk)
- Roxburgh Park leaves renters under less rental stress (24% vs 33%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Coolaroo
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- gets more of its commuters onto trains and trams (10% vs 4%)
- sits closer to the CBD (21 km vs 23.6 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Coolaroo has more residents already 65 and over (19% vs 8%)
- Roxburgh Park carries lower crime risk (57/100 vs 93/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Roxburgh Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (10.6% vs 0.1%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Coolaroo and Roxburgh Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Roxburgh Park has more residents (24,129 vs 3,193); Roxburgh Park has higher household incomes ($84,708 vs $53,300).
| Coolaroo | Roxburgh Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,193 | 24,129 +656% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +0.1% | +10.6% |
| Median age | 37 | 31 |
| Median household income | $53,300/yr | $84,708/yr +59% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $335/wk | $390/wk +16% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (9.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Coolaroo | Roxburgh Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $625,000 | $705,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $542,500 |
| Median land price | — | $810,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 24 days from 13 sales | 26 days from 228 sales |
Zoning mix
Coolaroo has more industrially zoned land (46% vs 0%).
| Coolaroo | Roxburgh Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 31% | 77% |
| Industrial | 46% | 0% |
| Other and special use | 0% | 14% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 10% | 3% |
| Commercial | 9% | 2% |
| Parks and recreation | 3% | 4% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Coolaroo | Roxburgh Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 3,063 across Hume same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +0% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Coolaroo | Roxburgh Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.1% $507/wk on $642K | 4.3% $575/wk on $698K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Coolaroo | Roxburgh Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 28% of VIC | Higher than 40% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 12% of VIC | Higher than 55% of VIC |
| Schools | — | Higher than 5% of VIC |
| Walkability | Higher than 93% of VIC | Higher than 94% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 28% of VIC | Higher than 65% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 24% of VIC | Higher than 71% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 96% of VIC | Higher than 86% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 74% of VIC | Higher than 85% of VIC |
Liveability
| Coolaroo | Roxburgh Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | B |
| Score | 46/100 | 50/100 |
| Socio-economic band | high-need area decile 1/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
Coolaroo carries more flood risk (25 vs 15); Coolaroo carries more crime risk (93 vs 57).
| Coolaroo | Roxburgh Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 93/100 | Moderate 57/100 |
| Flood | Low 25/100 | Low 15/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | High 70/100 | None 0/100 |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 29 within 5 km | 19 within 5 km |
Schools
| Coolaroo | Roxburgh Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 | 5 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 5 |
Schools in Coolaroo
- St Mary's Coptic Orthodox College Independent · Combined above peers
- Coolaroo South Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Roxburgh Park
- Good Samaritan Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary below peers
- Roxburgh College Government · Secondary below peers
- Roxburgh Homestead Primary School Government · Primary below peers
- Roxburgh Park Primary School Government · Primary below peers
- Roxburgh Rise Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Coolaroo | Roxburgh Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 4 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 5 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 40 |
| Childcare | 6 | 12 |
| GPs | 4 | 5 |
| Pharmacies | 2 | 3 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 3 |
| Fuel stations | 2 | 3 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 2 |
| Waterways | 2 | 0 |
Mobility
Roxburgh Park sits further from the CBD (23.6 km vs 21 km).
| Coolaroo | Roxburgh Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 79/100 | 82/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 21 km | 23.6 km +12% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 32 min | 35 min |
| Public transport score | 93/100 Rail · Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 165.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 222.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 3048 | 0.8% postcode 3064 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 36 postcode 3048 | 60 postcode 3064 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (71.4%).
Setting
| Coolaroo | Roxburgh Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 147 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 190 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 20.4 km | 23.8 km |
NBN connectivity
| Coolaroo | Roxburgh Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 90/100 | 77/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 56% 1,626 premises | 58% 7,330 premises |
Climate
| Coolaroo | Roxburgh Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 534 mm | 518 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | 26.7°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.5°C | 6.0°C |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Coolaroo | Roxburgh Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 3.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | — same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Coolaroo | Roxburgh Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,715/yr same for both | |
| Council | Hume same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Coolaroo | Roxburgh Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Calwell same for both | |
| Member | Basem Abdo same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Coolaroo | Roxburgh Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Roxburgh Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Coolaroo
Other comparisons with Roxburgh Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.