Coolabine vs Kidaman Creek
In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Coolabine, most households are people living alone. In Kidaman Creek, about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Coolabine tends to suit people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Kidaman Creek
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (3 vs 0)
- is already more of a family suburb (49% vs 36%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Coolabine
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (42% vs 16%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Kidaman Creek
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (111.2 km vs 152.7 km)
- has a shorter drive in (110 min vs 117 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Too close to call
Nothing among the 4 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Coolabine
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (7.0% vs -3.8%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Coolabine and Kidaman Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Kidaman Creek has more residents (125 vs 76); Coolabine skews older (53 vs 51).
| Coolabine | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 76 | 125 +64% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +7.0% | -3.8% |
| Median age | 53 | 51 |
| Median household income | $56,316/yr +5% vs other | $53,300/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $245/wk | $250/wk +2% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (25.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (13.2%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Development activity
| Coolabine | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 2,962 across Sunshine Coast same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -41% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Coolabine | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 19% of QLD | Higher than 16% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 59% of QLD | Higher than 34% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 65% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 35% of QLD | Higher than 57% of QLD |
Liveability
| Coolabine | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Kidaman Creek carries more bushfire risk (40 vs 0).
| Coolabine | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Moderate 40/100 |
| Crime | Low 36/100 | Low 27/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Coolabine | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Coolabine | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 3 |
| Waterways | 1 | 2 |
Mobility
Coolabine sits further from the CBD (152.7 km vs 111.2 km).
| Coolabine | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 152.7 km +27% vs other | 111.2 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 117 min | 110 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 4574 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 76 postcode 4574 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (65.2%).
Setting
| Coolabine | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 113 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 130 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 30.1 km same for both | |
NBN connectivity
| Coolabine | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 26/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 55 premises | 0% 73 premises |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Coolabine | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 4.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 12.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Coolabine | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,690/yr same for both | |
| Council | Sunshine Coast same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Coolabine | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Fairfax same for both | |
| Member | Ted O'Brien same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Coolabine | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Coolabine
Other comparisons with Kidaman Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.