Cooks Gap vs Cope
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Cope, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Cope: a median of $1.1 million, against $722,000 in Cooks Gap, though rent is higher in Cooks Gap. On these figures, Cooks Gap tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget, while Cope suits older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Cooks Gap
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (37/100 vs 76/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Cooks Gap
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (24% vs 37%)
- has cheaper houses ($722,500 vs $1,100,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Cope
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($200/wk vs $300/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Cooks Gap
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (8/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (251 min vs 262 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (305 km vs 317.9 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Cooks Gap
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (8/100 vs 0/100)
- carries lower crime risk (37/100 vs 76/100)
- But Cope has more residents already 65 and over (21% vs 12%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Cooks Gap
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (1.7% vs -11.7%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Cooks Gap and Cope drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Cooks Gap has more residents (549 vs 113); Cooks Gap rents higher ($300/wk vs $200/wk).
| Cooks Gap | Cope | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 549 +79% vs other | 113 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +1.7% | -11.7% |
| Median age | 43 same for both | |
| Median household income | $85,124/yr +31% vs other | $58,500/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $300/wk +33% vs other | $200/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (28.3%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (8.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Cooks Gap | Cope | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $722,500 | $1,100,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
Cope has more rural and farming land (84% vs 24%).
| Cooks Gap | Cope | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 24% | 84% |
| Residential | 67% | 10% |
| Environmental | 8% | 6% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Cooks Gap | Cope | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 131 across Mid-Western same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -4% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Cooks Gap | Cope | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 32% of NSW | Higher than 57% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 55% of NSW | Higher than 20% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 52% of NSW | Higher than 44% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 71% of NSW | Higher than 19% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 23% of NSW | Higher than 12% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 51% of NSW | Higher than 36% of NSW |
Liveability
Cooks Gap is more walkable (8 vs 0).
| Cooks Gap | Cope | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | D | — |
| Score | 28/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | high-need area decile 1/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Cope carries more crime risk (76 vs 37).
| Cooks Gap | Cope | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 42/100 | Moderate 48/100 |
| Crime | Low 37/100 | High 76/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Cooks Gap | Cope | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Cooks Gap | Cope | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 13 | 11 |
Mobility
Cope sits further from the CBD (317.9 km vs 305 km).
| Cooks Gap | Cope | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 8/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 305 km | 317.9 km +4% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 251 min | 262 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.2% postcode 2850 | 0.1% postcode 2852 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 50 postcode 2850 | 50 postcode 2852 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (83.4%).
Setting
| Cooks Gap | Cope | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 587 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 494 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Cooks Gap | Cope | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 25/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 263 premises | 0% 53 premises |
Climate
| Cooks Gap | Cope | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 669 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 31.0°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 3.4°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Cooks Gap | Cope | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,083/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mid-Western same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Cooks Gap | Cope | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Calare same for both | |
| Member | Andrew Gee same for both | |
| Party | Independent same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Cooks Gap | Cope | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Cooks Gap
Other comparisons with Cope
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.