Coochin Creek vs Bells Creek
Bells Creek is the younger of the two, with a median age of 31 against 41 in Coochin Creek. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Coochin Creek, most households are couple families. On these figures, Coochin Creek tends to suit couples and older residents, while Bells Creek suits young adults.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Bells Creek
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (4 vs 0)
- has more schools inside the suburb (2 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Coochin Creek
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (26% vs 13%)
- has cheaper rent ($395/wk vs $560/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Bells Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (13/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Coochin Creek has more residents already 65 and over (26% vs 10%)
- Bells Creek is more walkable (13/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Where they sit
Coochin Creek and Bells Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Bells Creek has more residents (343 vs 76); Bells Creek rents higher ($560/wk vs $395/wk).
| Coochin Creek | Bells Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 76 | 343 +351% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -9.5% | — |
| Median age | 41 | 31 |
| Median household income | $84,448/yr | $100,984/yr +20% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $395/wk | $560/wk +42% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (26.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.3%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Development activity
| Coochin Creek | Bells Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 2,962 across Sunshine Coast same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -41% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Coochin Creek | Bells Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 55% of QLD | Higher than 75% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 14% of QLD | Higher than 74% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 73% of QLD | Higher than 82% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 25% of QLD | Higher than 99% of QLD |
Liveability
Bells Creek is more walkable (13 vs 0).
| Coochin Creek | Bells Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | advantaged area decile 8/10 |
Risk profile
| Coochin Creek | Bells Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 44/100 | Low 37/100 |
| Crime | High 99/100 | High 96/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | Low 23/100 | None 0/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 3 within 5 km |
Schools
| Coochin Creek | Bells Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 2 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 2 |
Schools in Coochin Creek
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Bells Creek
- Nirimba State Primary School Government · Primary below peers
- Notre Dame College Catholic · Combined below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Coochin Creek | Bells Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 2 |
| Childcare | 0 | 4 |
| Fuel stations | 1 same for both | |
| EV chargers | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 14 | 16 |
Mobility
| Coochin Creek | Bells Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 13/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 78.3 km | 78.5 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 70 min | 66 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.7% postcode 4519 | 1.0% postcode 4551 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 88 postcode 4519 | 72 postcode 4551 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (89.3%).
Setting
| Coochin Creek | Bells Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 20 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 5 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 2.8 km | 3.8 km 4.9 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Coochin Creek | Bells Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 18/100 | 100/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 23 premises | 100% 2,505 premises |
Climate
| Coochin Creek | Bells Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,052 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 27.8°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 14.7°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Coochin Creek | Bells Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.31 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Coochin Creek | Bells Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,690/yr same for both | |
| Council | Sunshine Coast same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Coochin Creek | Bells Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Fisher same for both | |
| Member | Andrew Wallace same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Coochin Creek | Bells Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Coochin Creek
Other comparisons with Bells Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.