Conjola Park vs Yatte Yattah
Conjola Park is the younger of the two, with a median age of 51 against 57 in Yatte Yattah. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Conjola Park, about half of households are people living alone. In Yatte Yattah, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Yatte Yattah: a median of $2.58 million, against $860,000 in Conjola Park, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Conjola Park tends to suit people living alone and buyers on a tighter budget, while Yatte Yattah suits older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Yatte Yattah
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (13/100 vs 25/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (65% vs 51%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Conjola Park
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper houses ($860,000 vs $2,577,500)
- has cheaper land ($471,500 vs $591,800)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Conjola Park
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (19% vs 6%)
- has cheaper rent ($370/wk vs $450/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Conjola Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (27/100 vs 8/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Yatte Yattah
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (13/100 vs 25/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (36% vs 25%)
- But Conjola Park is more walkable (27/100 vs 8/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Yatte Yattah
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (5.0% vs -12.4%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Conjola Park and Yatte Yattah drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Conjola Park has more residents (298 vs 189); Yatte Yattah has higher household incomes ($84,500 vs $61,412).
| Conjola Park | Yatte Yattah | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 298 +37% vs other | 189 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -12.4% | +5.0% |
| Median age | 51 | 57 |
| Median household income | $61,412/yr | $84,500/yr +38% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $370/wk | $450/wk +22% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (27.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.0%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Conjola Park | Yatte Yattah | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $860,000 | $2,577,500 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $471,500 | $591,800 |
Zoning mix
Yatte Yattah has more rural and farming land (87% vs 55%); Conjola Park has more land zoned for conservation (28% vs 11%).
| Conjola Park | Yatte Yattah | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 55% | 87% |
| Environmental | 28% | 11% |
| Residential | 12% | 0% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 3% | 2% |
| Parks and recreation | 2% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Conjola Park | Yatte Yattah | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 854 across Shoalhaven same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -10% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Conjola Park | Yatte Yattah | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 21% of NSW | Higher than 91% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 23% of NSW | Higher than 54% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 73% of NSW | Higher than 55% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 66% of NSW | Higher than 6% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 71% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 54% of NSW | Higher than 62% of NSW |
Liveability
Conjola Park is more walkable (27 vs 8).
| Conjola Park | Yatte Yattah | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
Conjola Park carries more crime risk (25 vs 13).
| Conjola Park | Yatte Yattah | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 95/100 | High 86/100 |
| Crime | Low 25/100 | Low 13/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Conjola Park | Yatte Yattah | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Conjola Park | Yatte Yattah | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 same for both | |
| Waterways | 0 | 8 |
Mobility
| Conjola Park | Yatte Yattah | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 27/100 | 8/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 214.7 km | 215.5 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 175 min | 176 min |
| Public transport score | 20/100 Bus | 22/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 3.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 4.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.7% postcode 2539 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 44 postcode 2539 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (87.5%).
Setting
| Conjola Park | Yatte Yattah | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 42 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 10 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 4.5 km 4.8 km to a named beach | 6.0 km |
NBN connectivity
| Conjola Park | Yatte Yattah | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 266 premises | 0% 97 premises |
Climate
| Conjola Park | Yatte Yattah | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,302 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 23.9°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 9.6°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Conjola Park | Yatte Yattah | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,501/yr same for both | |
| Council | Shoalhaven same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Conjola Park | Yatte Yattah | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Gilmore same for both | |
| Member | Fiona Phillips same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Conjola Park | Yatte Yattah | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Conjola Park
Other comparisons with Yatte Yattah
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.