Conjola vs Fishermans Paradise
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Conjola, most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Conjola: a median of $1.43 million, against $668,000 in Fishermans Paradise, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Conjola tends to suit couples, while Fishermans Paradise suits people living alone and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Conjola
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is already more of a family suburb (73% vs 48%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Conjola leaves households under less mortgage stress (26% vs 34%)
- Fishermans Paradise has cheaper houses ($667,500 vs $1,430,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Conjola leaves renters under less rental stress (23% vs 30%)
- Fishermans Paradise has cheaper rent ($300/wk vs $375/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Too close to call
Nothing among the 4 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Conjola and Fishermans Paradise drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Fishermans Paradise has more residents (491 vs 148); Conjola has higher household incomes ($84,448 vs $52,832).
| Conjola | Fishermans Paradise | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 148 | 491 +232% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +0.0% | +2.9% |
| Median age | 52 | 50 |
| Median household income | $84,448/yr +37% vs other | $52,832/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $375/wk +20% vs other | $300/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (8.1%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (30.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Conjola | Fishermans Paradise | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,430,000 | $667,500 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 90 days from 7 sales |
Zoning mix
Conjola has more land zoned for conservation (40% vs 15%); Fishermans Paradise has more rural and farming land (77% vs 58%).
| Conjola | Fishermans Paradise | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 58% | 77% |
| Environmental | 40% | 15% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 6% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 2% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Conjola | Fishermans Paradise | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 854 across Shoalhaven same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -10% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Conjola | Fishermans Paradise | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 3.2% $480/wk on $770K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Conjola | Fishermans Paradise | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 68% of NSW | Higher than 20% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 51% of NSW | Higher than 13% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 71% of NSW | Higher than 72% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 31% of NSW | Higher than 56% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 70% of NSW | Higher than 71% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 40% of NSW | Higher than 56% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 31% of NSW |
Liveability
| Conjola | Fishermans Paradise | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
Conjola carries more bushfire risk (90 vs 0).
| Conjola | Fishermans Paradise | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 90/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 52/100 | Moderate 59/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Conjola | Fishermans Paradise | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Conjola | Fishermans Paradise | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 same for both | |
| Waterways | 10 | 1 |
Mobility
| Conjola | Fishermans Paradise | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 23/100 | 25/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 211.1 km | 210.6 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 173 min | 171 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.7% postcode 2539 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 44 postcode 2539 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (82.4%).
Setting
| Conjola | Fishermans Paradise | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 2 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 27 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 6.6 km | 6.0 km |
NBN connectivity
| Conjola | Fishermans Paradise | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 28/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 70 premises | 0% 305 premises |
Climate
| Conjola | Fishermans Paradise | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,302 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 23.9°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 9.6°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Conjola | Fishermans Paradise | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,501/yr same for both | |
| Council | Shoalhaven same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Conjola | Fishermans Paradise | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Gilmore same for both | |
| Member | Fiona Phillips same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Conjola | Fishermans Paradise | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Conjola
Other comparisons with Fishermans Paradise
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.