Coningham vs Lower Snug
Coningham is the younger of the two, with a median age of 40 against 45 in Lower Snug. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Coningham, about half of households are couple families. In Lower Snug, most households are couple families. On these figures, Coningham tends to suit share households and families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Lower Snug
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is already more of a family suburb (70% vs 62%)
Weighs schools, house stock, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Lower Snug
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (29 min vs 35 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (27.2 km vs 29.6 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Lower Snug
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more residents already 65 and over (19% vs 11%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.
Investors
Coningham
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (29.6% vs 4.1%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Coningham and Lower Snug drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Lower Snug has more residents (460 vs 328); Lower Snug skews older (45 vs 40).
| Coningham | Lower Snug | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 328 | 460 +40% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +29.6% | +4.1% |
| Median age | 40 | 45 |
| Median household income | $97,500/yr | $104,468/yr +7% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $318/wk | $320/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.7%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Coningham | Lower Snug | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,055,000 | $972,500 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 10 days from 4 sales | 16 days from 3 sales |
Zoning mix
Lower Snug has more rural and farming land (47% vs 0%); Coningham has more land zoned for conservation (92% vs 46%).
| Coningham | Lower Snug | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 92% | 46% |
| Rural and farming | 0% | 47% |
| Residential | 8% | 6% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 0% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Coningham | Lower Snug | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 138 across Kingborough same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -13% same for both | |
Ranking within TAS
| Coningham | Lower Snug | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 89% of TAS | Higher than 92% of TAS |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 75% of TAS | Higher than 74% of TAS |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 96% of TAS same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 82% of TAS | Higher than 77% of TAS |
Liveability
| Coningham | Lower Snug | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
| Coningham | Lower Snug | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 97/100 | High 96/100 |
| Crime | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | Low 10/100 | None 0/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Coningham | Lower Snug | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Coningham | Lower Snug | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 3 |
| Beaches | 2 | 0 |
| Waterways | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
Coningham sits further from the CBD (29.6 km vs 27.2 km).
| Coningham | Lower Snug | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 10/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Hobart | 29.6 km +8% vs other | 27.2 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 35 min | 29 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.0% postcode 7054 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 41 postcode 7054 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (71.9%).
Setting
| Coningham | Lower Snug | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 122 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 53 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 851 m 918 m to a named beach | 1.8 km 2.1 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Coningham | Lower Snug | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 64/100 | 53/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 35% 150 premises | 22% 187 premises |
Climate
| Coningham | Lower Snug | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | — same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Coningham | Lower Snug | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,735/yr same for both | |
| Council | Kingborough same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Coningham | Lower Snug | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Franklin same for both | |
| Member | Julie Collins same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Coningham | Lower Snug | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $20,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Lower Snug
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Coningham
Other comparisons with Lower Snug
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.