Condamine Plains vs Cecil Plains
Condamine Plains is the younger of the two, with a median age of 39 against 47 in Cecil Plains. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Condamine Plains, the large majority of households are couple families. In Cecil Plains, about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Condamine Plains tends to suit families with children and couples, while Cecil Plains suits older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Cecil Plains
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (4 vs 0)
- has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
- But Condamine Plains is already more of a family suburb (100% vs 46%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
Renters
Condamine Plains
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (6% vs 16%)
- has cheaper rent ($150/wk vs $200/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Cecil Plains
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more residents already 65 and over (21% vs 10%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Condamine Plains
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (-1.9% vs -11.4%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Condamine Plains and Cecil Plains drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Cecil Plains has more residents (380 vs 101); Condamine Plains has higher household incomes ($122,148 vs $66,612).
| Condamine Plains | Cecil Plains | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 101 | 380 +276% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -1.9% | -11.4% |
| Median age | 39 | 47 |
| Median household income | $122,148/yr +45% vs other | $66,612/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $150/wk | $200/wk +33% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.0%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Condamine Plains | Cecil Plains | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $347,888 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Development activity
| Condamine Plains | Cecil Plains | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,513 across Toowoomba same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -25% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Condamine Plains | Cecil Plains | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 91% of QLD | Higher than 32% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 16% of QLD | Higher than 57% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 67% of QLD | — |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 35% of QLD | Higher than 23% of QLD |
Liveability
| Condamine Plains | Cecil Plains | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
Cecil Plains carries more bushfire risk (61 vs 0).
| Condamine Plains | Cecil Plains | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Moderate 61/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 52/100 | Moderate 56/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Condamine Plains | Cecil Plains | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Condamine Plains
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Cecil Plains
- Cecil Plains State School Government · Combined above peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Condamine Plains | Cecil Plains | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 4 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 1 | 11 |
Mobility
| Condamine Plains | Cecil Plains | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 211.4 km | 212.1 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 157 min | 161 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 4352 | 0.0% postcode 4407 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 84 postcode 4352 | 64 postcode 4407 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (72.2%).
Setting
| Condamine Plains | Cecil Plains | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 371 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 359 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Condamine Plains | Cecil Plains | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 27/100 | 16/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Satellite (Sky Muster) |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 40 premises same for both | |
Council rates
| Condamine Plains | Cecil Plains | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,618/yr same for both | |
| Council | Toowoomba same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Condamine Plains | Cecil Plains | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Maranoa same for both | |
| Member | David Littleproud same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Condamine Plains | Cecil Plains | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Condamine Plains
Other comparisons with Cecil Plains
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.