Como vs Manning
In both, most households own their home. In Como, about half of households are people living alone. In Manning, the large majority of homes are detached houses and about half of households are couple families. Como is closer to the city centre: 7.9 km, against 9.8 km. On these figures, Como tends to suit young adults and people living alone, while Manning suits families with children and couples.
Como is a larger, more established suburb closer to the CBD at 7.9 km, while Manning is a quieter, smaller community 9.8 km out. Manning scores notably higher on liveability (80 vs 62) and walkability (81 vs 67), and household incomes are stronger there at $114,816 compared to Como's $92,560. House prices are similar, but Como offers significantly cheaper units at $693,250 versus Manning's $1,170,000. Como has a higher flood risk (46 vs 21), though both share the same crime risk and zero bushfire risk. Como may appeal to investors seeking rental yield (4.4% on houses), while Manning suits those prioritising walkable, liveable surroundings.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Como has more childcare (10 vs 3)
- Manning has more separate houses rather than flats (88% vs 33%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Como
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper units ($693,250 vs $1,170,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Como
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (42% vs 32%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Manning
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (81/100 vs 67/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Como has more units and townhouses to downsize into (67% vs 12%)
- Manning is more walkable (81/100 vs 67/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Como
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.4% vs 2.8%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Como and Manning drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Como has more residents (14,786 vs 4,219); Manning has higher household incomes ($114,816 vs $92,560).
| Como | Manning | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,786 +71% vs other | 4,219 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +4.6% | +1.9% |
| Median age | 38 same for both | |
| Median household income | $92,560/yr | $114,816/yr +24% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $350/wk +3% vs other | $340/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.7%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Como | Manning | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,500,000 | $1,450,000 |
| Median unit price | $693,250 | $1,170,000 |
| Median land price | — | $1,425,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 31 days from 105 sales | 22 days from 14 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
62 vs 22 sales
61 vs 16 sales
Development activity
| Como | Manning | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 442 across South Perth same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +24% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Como | Manning | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.4% $838/wk on $1M | 2.8% $900/wk on $1.7M |
| Units | 5.2% $738/wk on $735K | — |
Ranking within WA
| Como | Manning | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 56% of WA | Higher than 81% of WA |
| Schools | Higher than 42% of WA | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 89% of WA | Higher than 95% of WA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 96% of WA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 96% of WA | Higher than 100% of WA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 49% of WA | Higher than 3% of WA |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 44% of WA | — |
Liveability
Manning scores higher overall (80 vs 62); Manning is more walkable (81 vs 67).
| Como | Manning | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | A |
| Score | 62/100 | 80/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
Como carries more flood risk (46 vs 21).
| Como | Manning | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 68/100 same for both | |
| Flood | Moderate 46/100 | Low 21/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 6 within 5 km | 7 within 5 km |
Schools
| Como | Manning | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 6 | 2 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 2 |
| Rated at peers | 3 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Curtin University of Technology, 3.8 km | 3 Curtin University of Technology, 3.6 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 4.3% | 4.4% |
Schools in Como
- Como Secondary College Government · Secondary above peers
- Como Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Penrhos College Independent · Combined at peers
- St Pius X Catholic School Catholic · Primary at peers
- Collier Primary School Government · Primary below peers
- Alta-1 College - Como Campus Independent · Secondary · Special school
Schools in Manning
- Curtin Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- Manning Primary School Government · Primary above peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Como | Manning | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 8 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 12 | 6 |
| Childcare | 10 | 3 |
| GPs | 4 same for both | |
| Pharmacies | 2 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 2 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 2 same for both | |
Mobility
| Como | Manning | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 67/100 | 81/100 |
| Distance to Perth | 7.9 km | 9.8 km +24% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 13 min same for both | |
| Public transport score | 94/100 Rail · Bus | 94/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 522.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 166.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.4% postcode 6152 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 37 postcode 6152 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (70.4%).
Setting
| Como | Manning | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 24 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 13 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 11.0 km 3.4 km to a named beach | 11.1 km 2.0 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Como | Manning | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 91/100 | 100/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 67% 8,444 premises | 100% 1,879 premises |
Climate
| Como | Manning | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 650 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Como | Manning | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Swan same for both | |
| Member | Zaneta Mascarenhas same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Como | Manning | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $800,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Como
Other comparisons with Manning
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.